Kawasaki Z1000 2013 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014
Kawasaki Z1000 2013
BMW S 1000 R 2014
Visão geral - Kawasaki Z1000 2013 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014
The Kawasaki Z1000 2013 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both naked bikes with powerful inline engines and similar suspension systems. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine specifications, the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 has a power output of 138 HP and a torque of 110 Nm, while the BMW S 1000 R 2014 boasts a more impressive 160 HP and 112 Nm of torque. Both bikes have four cylinders and displacements of 1043ccm and 999ccm respectively.
When it comes to the suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. The Kawasaki Z1000 2013 has an aluminum frame with a double cradle design, while the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has an aluminum frame with a double tube design.
Kawasaki Z1000 2013
In terms of braking, both bikes have dual disc brakes at the front with four-piston calipers. The Kawasaki Z1000 2013 features radial petal technology, while the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has radial technology.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The rear tire width is also the same at 190mm with a diameter of 17 inches. The Kawasaki Z1000 2013 has a wheelbase of 1440mm, while the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1439mm. The seat height of the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 is 815mm, while the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly lower seat height of 814mm. The fuel tank capacity of the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 is 15 liters, while the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.
BMW S 1000 R 2014
In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 is praised for its powerful engine, rich sound, and unique design. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 is commended for its sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, excellent electronic aids, and great price-performance ratio. It is also noted that the BMW S 1000 R 2014 performs well on both the racetrack and rural roads.
In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 lacks traction control and has a nervous chassis. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 is criticized for its slightly rough engine operation, relatively high seat height, and subjective design preferences.
Overall, both the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are powerful and capable naked bikes, but the BMW offers more advanced features and a higher level of performance. However, personal preferences and priorities will ultimately determine which bike is the better choice for each individual rider.
Especificações técnicas Kawasaki Z1000 2013 em comparação com BMW S 1000 R 2014
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Kawasaki Z1000 2013
Em suma, a nova Z1000 é uma evolução bem sucedida da sua antecessora. A falta de controlo de tração é mais um problema de marketing do que um problema para os clientes finais.
BMW S 1000 R 2014
Potência brutal, eletrónica suave, quase perfeita, só melhora com a HP4. Agora a BMW domina a classe das motos naked de 1000cc depois das superbikes.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Kawasaki Z1000 vs BMW S 1000 R
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z1000 2013 and a BMW S 1000 R 2014. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2014 is about 20% higher. A Kawasaki Z1000 2013 experiences a loss of 910 EUR in one year and 900 EUR in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 730 EUR and 760 EUR for a BMW S 1000 R 2014. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014 there are less Kawasaki Z1000 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 19. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z1000 with 69 days compared to 70 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 41 reviews for the Kawasaki Z1000 and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Kawasaki Z1000 was published on 02/09/2002 and now has more than 5 800 views. This compares to more than 17 300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.
