Magazine
Brands
Top Awards
Compare
About us
Home
Vergleiche
Peugeot Kisbee 50 4T 2020 vs. Peugeot Kisbee 50 RS 4T 2020
Ural Ranger 2014 vs. Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Ural Ranger 2014
Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Loading...
Overview - Ural Ranger 2014 vs Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Ural Ranger 2014
Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Technical Specifications Ural Ranger 2014 compared to Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Ural Ranger 2014
Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Show all
Same only
Differences
Ural Ranger 2014
Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Engine and Drive Train
Engine power
Engine power
41 HP
Engine power
40 HP
Transmission
Transmission
Prop shaft
Transmission
Prop shaft
Cylinders
Cylinders
2
Cylinders
2
Strokes
Strokes
4-Stroke
Strokes
4-Stroke
Cooling
Cooling
Air
Cooling
Air
Displacement
Displacement
749 ccm
Displacement
745 ccm
Dimensions and Weights
Seat Height
Seat Height
750 mm
Seat Height
790 mm
Dry Weight
Dry Weight
331 kg
Dry Weight
330 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity
Fuel Tank Capacity
19 l
Fuel Tank Capacity
19 l
License compliancy
License compliancy
A2
License compliancy
A2
Alternative Comparisons
VS.
Ural Ranger 2014 vs
BMW R 1250 RT 2021
VS.
Ural Ranger 2014 vs
BMW F 850 GS 2021
VS.
Ural Gespann Classic 2006 vs
BMW R 1200 RT 2009
VS.
Ural Ranger 2008 vs
Mash Side Force 2022
VS.
Ural Gespann Classic 2006 vs
Mash Force 400 2020
VS.
Ural Ranger 2008 vs
Ural Gespann Classic 2006
VS.
Ural Ranger 2014 vs
BMW K 1200 LT 2009
VS.
Ural Ranger 2014 vs
Ural Retro Solo 2008
VS.
Ural Ranger 2014 vs
Ural Tourist 2010
VS.
Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs
Honda CB650R 2019
VS.
SWM Varez 125 2020 vs
KTM 125 Duke 2018
VS.
Yamaha MT-07 2019 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2021
VS.
KTM 790 Duke 2020 vs
Yamaha MT-10 2022
1000PS Partner