Magazine
Brands
Top Awards
Compare
About us
Home
Compara
Polaris RZR 800 2010 vs. Polaris RZR 800 S 2010
Ural Ranger 2008 vs. Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Ural Ranger 2008
Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Loading...
Overview - Ural Ranger 2008 vs Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Ural Ranger 2008
Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Technical Specifications Ural Ranger 2008 compared to Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Ural Ranger 2008
Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Show all
Same only
Differences
Ural Ranger 2008
Ural Gespann Classic 2006
Engine and Drive Train
Engine power
Engine power
40 HP
Engine power
40 HP
Transmission
Transmission
Prop shaft
Transmission
Prop shaft
Cylinders
Cylinders
2
Cylinders
2
Strokes
Strokes
4-Stroke
Strokes
4-Stroke
Cooling
Cooling
Air
Cooling
Air
Displacement
Displacement
745 ccm
Displacement
745 ccm
Dimensions and Weights
Wheelbase
Wheelbase
1,510 mm
Wheelbase
1,510 mm
Seat Height
Seat Height
790 mm
Seat Height
790 mm
Dry Weight
Dry Weight
330 kg
Dry Weight
330 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity
Fuel Tank Capacity
19 l
Fuel Tank Capacity
19 l
Top Speed
Top Speed
110 km/h
Top Speed
110 km/h
License compliancy
License compliancy
A2
License compliancy
A2
Alternative Comparisons
VS.
Ural Ranger 2014 vs
BMW R 1250 RT 2021
VS.
Ural Ranger 2014 vs
BMW F 850 GS 2021
VS.
Ural Gespann Classic 2006 vs
BMW R 1200 RT 2009
VS.
Ural Ranger 2008 vs
Mash Side Force 2022
VS.
Ural Gespann Classic 2006 vs
Mash Force 400 2020
VS.
Ural Ranger 2014 vs
Mash Side Force 2022
VS.
Ural Ranger 2014 vs
Ural Gespann Classic 2006
VS.
Ural Ranger 2014 vs
Ural Retro Solo 2008
VS.
Ural Ranger 2014 vs
Ural Tourist 2010
VS.
Honda SW-T 400 2009 vs
Kawasaki J300 2014
VS.
Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2016 vs
BMW R 1250 GS 2019
VS.
Ducati Scrambler Icon 2015 vs
Triumph Trident 660 2021
VS.
Kawasaki Z 650 2020 vs
Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005
1000PS Partner