Ural Ranger 2014 vs. BMW F 850 GS 2021

Ural Ranger 2014

Ural Ranger 2014

BMW F 850 GS 2021

BMW F 850 GS 2021

Loading...

Overview - Ural Ranger 2014 vs BMW F 850 GS 2021

Ural Ranger 2014

Ural Ranger 2014

BMW F 850 GS 2021

BMW F 850 GS 2021

Technical Specifications Ural Ranger 2014 compared to BMW F 850 GS 2021

Ural Ranger 2014
BMW F 850 GS 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeBoxerEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore84 mm
StrokeStroke78 mmStroke77 mm
Engine powerEngine power41 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power5,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,250 rpm
TorqueTorque57 NmTorque92 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,300 rpmRpm at Torque6,250 rpm
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeDryClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears4Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement749 ccmDisplacement853 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,280 mmLength2,305 mm
WidthWidth1,630 mmWidth922 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height750 mmSeat Height860 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Ural Ranger 2014

Ural Ranger 2014

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW F 850 GS 2021

BMW F 850 GS 2021

The BMW F 850 GS also scores points in 2022 with its pleasant ergonomics and accessible character. Operation is easy and you quickly feel comfortable on the motorbike. The longer the tour, the more you miss the finesse in the details. The damping of the fork is too lax and not adjustable. The engine gets a bit boring in the long run, and the gearstick and quickshifter are always stiff. In direct comparison with other touring enduros, it is always somewhat overshadowed by more exciting models.

Good wind and weather protection

well thought-out operating concept

practical equipment

very accessible operation and driveability in everyday use

good seat comfort

great connectivity solution

Vibrations in the upper rev range

boring engine

stiff quickshifter gearstick

front damping too lax

fork not adjustable

ponderous feel

front brake could do with more bite.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Ural Ranger vs BMW F 850 GS

Price Ural Ranger

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price BMW F 850 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH