KTM 690 Duke 2012 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2016
KTM 690 Duke 2012
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Преглед - KTM 690 Duke 2012 vs Yamaha MT-09 2016
In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 clearly outperforms the KTM 690 Duke 2012. The MT-09 boasts an impressive 115 HP compared to the Duke's 70 HP. This significant difference in power translates to a more thrilling and exhilarating riding experience on the MT-09.
Similarly, the torque output of the MT-09 is also higher at 87.5 Nm compared to the Duke's 70 Nm. This means that the MT-09 has more low-end grunt and better acceleration, making it more suitable for quick overtakes and spirited riding.
When it comes to the engine configuration, the Duke has a single-cylinder engine while the MT-09 features a three-cylinder engine. The three-cylinder setup of the MT-09 provides smoother power delivery and a more refined riding experience compared to the Duke's single-cylinder engine.
In terms of suspension, both bikes have telescopic forks at the front, but the Duke has an upside-down telescopic fork, which is generally considered to be more advanced and provides better handling and stability. However, the MT-09 offers a fully adjustable chassis, allowing riders to fine-tune the suspension to their preferences.
KTM 690 Duke 2012
The chassis of the Duke is made of chromium-molybdenum, which is known for its strength and durability. On the other hand, the MT-09 features an aluminum frame, which is lighter and offers better handling and maneuverability.
In terms of tire dimensions, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the MT-09 has a wider rear tire at 180 mm compared to the Duke's 160 mm. This wider rear tire provides better traction and stability, especially during aggressive cornering.
The wheelbase of the Duke is slightly longer at 1466 mm compared to the MT-09's 1440 mm. A longer wheelbase generally contributes to better stability at high speeds, while a shorter wheelbase enhances maneuverability and agility.
In terms of seat height, the Duke has a higher seat height at 835 mm compared to the MT-09's 815 mm. This may be a factor to consider for riders with shorter inseams, as a higher seat height can make it more challenging to reach the ground.
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters, providing a decent range for long rides.
In terms of strengths, the Duke is praised for its exceptional speed and smoothness, precise and manageable chassis, and overall agility. On the other hand, the MT-09 is commended for its powerful three-cylinder engine, three power modes, fully adjustable chassis, quickshifter as standard, sporty upright seating position, good brakes, aggressive looks, and traction control.
However, the Duke has been criticized for its handling in bends, which may take some getting used to. The MT-09 has also been noted to have a slightly hard saddle for long tours and a license plate holder on the swingarm that offers less splash protection than a conventional one.
In conclusion, while the KTM 690 Duke 2012 may have its strengths in terms of speed and agility, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 clearly outshines it in terms of power, engine configuration, suspension adjustability, and overall features. The MT-09 offers a more refined and thrilling riding experience, making it the preferred choice for riders seeking a high-performance naked bike.
Техничке спецификације KTM 690 Duke 2012 у поређењу са Yamaha MT-09 2016
За и против у поређењу
За и против у поређењу
KTM 690 Duke 2012
More than a decade after its launch, the KTM 690 Duke remains a fascinating bike with its own character. The attempt to turn the rebellious Duke into a bike with more mass appeal has proven to be a successful strategy. The combination of an outstanding LC4 engine, direct handling and good value for money continues to make it an attractive option for riders looking for something special. Although newer twin-cylinder models are superior in terms of smooth running and comfort, the 690 Duke offers an immediacy and character that only a large single-cylinder can deliver. As a used motorbike, it has proven to be surprisingly stable in value and durable - provided you pay attention to regular maintenance.
Прочитајте цео чланак на 1000ПС.цом
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Yamaha MT-09 behövde inte uppfinnas på nytt inför den kommande säsongen - det var redan extremt bra gjort för nästan fyra år sedan. Istället fokuserar japanerna på att finjustera och lägga till praktiska, moderna gimmickar som traction control och automatisk växling. På grund av Euro4-standarden har dock motorstyrningen ändrats ännu en gång och erbjuder en eftertryckligt kraftfull men väl kontrollerbar kraftöverföring i standardläget; den första generationens kraftexplosion erbjuds nu inte längre ens av det skarpare A-läget. Den största förändringen, som känns igen vid första anblicken, är den, enligt min mening, extremt framgångsrika designen med den mer aggressiva fronten och den nydesignade bakdelen. Allt som allt en ännu snyggare nakencykel som helt klart är byggd för att det ska vara kul att köra motorcykel.
Поређење цена Просечна тржишна цена KTM 690 Duke vs Yamaha MT-09
There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2012 and a Yamaha MT-09 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-09 2016 is about 42% higher. A KTM 690 Duke 2012 experiences a loss of 190 USD in one year and 660 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 420 USD and 720 USD for a Yamaha MT-09 2016. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016 there are more KTM 690 Duke 2012 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 16 compared to 11. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 50 days compared to 87 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.
