Yamaha Tenere 700 2022 vs. Honda XL750 Transalp 2023

The Yamaha Tenere 700 2022 and the Honda XL750 Transalp 2023 are both enduro motorcycles that offer a combination of on-road and off-road capabilities. While they have some similarities in terms of their technical specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.

In terms of engine performance, the Honda XL750 Transalp 2023 has a slight advantage over the Yamaha Tenere 700 2022. The Transalp has a larger displacement of 755cc compared to the Tenere's 689cc, resulting in a higher engine power of 92 HP compared to the Tenere's 73 HP. The Transalp also has a higher torque of 75 Nm compared to the Tenere's 68 Nm. However, both bikes have a 2-cylinder engine and use a chain transmission.

When it comes to suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks in the front and swing arm suspension in the rear. The Tenere 700 has a slightly longer front suspension travel of 210mm compared to the Transalp's 200mm. However, the Transalp has a slightly longer rear suspension travel of 190mm compared to the Tenere's 200mm.

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes in the front. The Tenere 700 does not specify the type of brakes, but it mentions that the braking performance is poor. On the other hand, the Transalp does not mention any issues with its braking system.

Yamaha Tenere 700 2022

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Transalp has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1560mm compared to the Tenere's 1590mm. The Transalp also has a lower seat height of 850mm compared to the Tenere's 880mm. Both bikes have a similar rear tire width of 150mm and a rear tire diameter of 18 inches. The Tenere has a front tire diameter of 21 inches, while the Transalp does not specify its front tire diameter.

When it comes to fuel capacity and range, the Transalp has a slightly larger fuel tank capacity of 16.9 liters compared to the Tenere's 16 liters. The Transalp also has a slightly longer range of 393km compared to the Tenere's 372km. Both bikes have a combined fuel consumption of 4.3 l/100km.

In terms of strengths, the Tenere 700 has a robust and reliable appearance, a sporty and sleek look, and a playful handling. It also has an amazingly sporty and fun engine, good workmanship, and a good chassis with a practical adjustment range. The Tenere 700 is comparatively lightweight and very off-road capable. It also has the ability to switch off ABS, which is useful for off-road riding.

Honda XL750 Transalp 2023

On the other hand, the Transalp has an accessible and fun engine that is well-suited for small pilots but also roomy enough for big riders. It offers good workmanship and value for money, and it has a low weight and easy handling in all situations. The Transalp also has low fuel consumption, which is beneficial for long rides.

In terms of weaknesses, the Tenere 700 lacks seating comfort on longer tours and has brakes that seem cheap with a lax pressure point and poor braking performance. It also has an annoying vibrating display and an impractical fuel filler cap. Additionally, the Tenere 700 has a very short equipment list in terms of electronics.

On the other hand, the Transalp does not have cruise control, not even as an accessory. Its components, which are trimmed for comfort, may reach their limits under tougher conditions. The Transalp also offers a top quickshifter only as an optional feature and has relatively little lean angle clearance. Its electronics are also carefully tuned, which may limit its performance in certain situations.

In conclusion, the Yamaha Tenere 700 2022 and the Honda XL750 Transalp 2023 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Tenere 700 offers a sporty and robust design, a fun engine, and good off-road capabilities. However, it lacks some comfort features and has issues with its brakes and electronics. On the other hand, the Transalp offers a comfortable and accessible engine, good workmanship, and low fuel consumption. However, it lacks some advanced features and may have limitations in certain conditions. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's priorities and preferences.