Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2017
Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Visão geral - Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 vs Yamaha MT-09 2017
The Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 are both naked bikes with inline engines and liquid cooling. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of power, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a significant advantage with 115 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022's 68.2 HP. The Yamaha also has a higher torque of 87.5 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 65.7 Nm. This means that the Yamaha MT-09 2017 will provide a more powerful and exhilarating riding experience.
Both bikes have fuel injection systems and 2-cylinder engines, but the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has an engine displacement of 847 ccm, while the Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 has a displacement of 649 ccm. This means that the Yamaha has a larger engine, which contributes to its higher power output.
In terms of suspension, both bikes have telescopic front forks and a monoshock rear suspension. However, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has the added advantage of a upside-down front fork, which provides better handling and stability.
Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022
The chassis of the Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 is made of steel, while the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has an aluminum frame. This means that the Yamaha is likely to be lighter and more agile, while the Kawasaki may offer more stability and durability.
Both bikes have dual disc front brakes, but the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a slightly smaller diameter of 298 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022's 300 mm. However, both bikes are equipped with ABS, which enhances safety and braking performance.
In terms of dimensions, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022's 1410 mm. The seat height of the Yamaha is also slightly lower at 815 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 820 mm. However, the Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 is slightly lighter with a curb weight of 187.1 kg compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2017's 193 kg.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
In terms of fuel capacity, the Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 has a larger fuel tank with a capacity of 15 liters compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2017's 14 liters. This means that the Kawasaki may offer a slightly longer range before needing to refuel.
In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 is praised for its retro design, analog gauges, lively engine, accessible handling, powerful brakes, comfortable ergonomics, adjustable levers, and overall appeal. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 is praised for its Öhlins suspension, Akrapovic exhaust, Magura HC3 radial brake pump, Carbon2Race covers, and effective combination of seat, footrests, and handlebar clamps.
In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 is noted to have a slightly softer sound. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 is criticized for its high cost, long working time for certain parts, and the fact that the ECU Flash is not legal for road use.
Overall, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 offers more power, better suspension, and additional features compared to the Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022. However, the Kawasaki may appeal to riders who prefer a more retro design and a slightly softer sound.
Especificações técnicas Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 em comparação com Yamaha MT-09 2017
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022
Com o RS, a Kawasaki prova que domina a arte das motos retrô. Você imediatamente esquece que por baixo do vestido bonito é o Z650 normal, porque graças aos detalhes certos, o design retro foi implementado de forma convincente. No selim, desfruta-se da acessibilidade que se conhece da irmã técnica. Uma moto retro que tanto os principiantes como os motociclistas experientes vão gostar muito!
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Em conclusão, depois de várias paragens ao longo da época, posso olhar para trás e ver um grande resultado. Tanto em termos de desempenho como de aspeto, a nossa MT-09 é perfeita. A suspensão foi provavelmente a nossa questão mais importante. Onde antes havia claramente (demasiado) movimento na traseira em curvas rápidas, agora está tudo resolvido sem pestanejar. O amortecedor STX 46 é bastante rígido na sua configuração básica, mas também consegue aguentar a vida quotidiana sem ser desconfortável. Graças às generosas opções de ajuste, ainda há espaço para preferências e utilizações individuais. A função do cartucho NIX 30 também é impressionante. O comportamento de resposta - especialmente sob carga - melhorou significativamente. Agora também há muito mais reserva disponível durante a travagem. Onde antes a forquilha entrava em bloqueio e o ABS era acionado quando se travava a fundo com a configuração original, agora os travões simplesmente continuam a funcionar eficazmente. Para além disso, a MT-09 segue agora a linha pretendida no raio de curva como se estivesse sozinha - um puro prazer. A visão e o som do sistema completo Akrapovic também são pura alegria, e o facto de produzir mais alguns cavalos de potência é sentido de forma eficaz, especialmente no terço superior da gama de rotações. A roda dianteira dispara ainda com mais vontade para a galeria na 2ª e 3ª velocidades.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Kawasaki Z650 RS vs Yamaha MT-09
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 and a Yamaha MT-09 2017. In terms of price, the actual average prices of both motorbikes are almost the same. A Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 experiences a loss of 370 EUR in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1 010 EUR for a Yamaha MT-09 2017. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2017 there are more Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 34 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 73 days compared to 146 days for the Kawasaki Z650 RS. Since model year 2022 1000PS.de editors have written 12 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 RS and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Kawasaki Z650 RS was published on 27/09/2021 and now has more than 39 300 views. This compares to more than 39 900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 10/06/2013.
