Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

The Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, they have some differences in terms of power, handling, and design.

In terms of power, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a higher horsepower of 160 HP compared to the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016's 140 HP. Both bikes have the same torque of 112 Nm. The BMW S 1000 R's four-cylinder engine provides a smoother and more powerful performance, while the Triumph Speed Triple R's unique three-cylinder engine offers a distinctive and punchy power delivery.

Both bikes have similar suspension setups with telescopic forks at the front and a monoshock at the rear. However, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 is equipped with high-quality Öhlins suspension components, which provide excellent damping and handling capabilities. The BMW S 1000 R 2014, on the other hand, features a dynamic suspension system that adjusts to different riding conditions, offering a comfortable and controlled ride.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2016

In terms of chassis, both bikes have an aluminum frame with a twin-tube design, providing a good balance between rigidity and weight. The Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1435 mm compared to the BMW S 1000 R 2014's 1439 mm, which may result in slightly different handling characteristics. The Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 also has a higher seat height of 825 mm compared to the BMW S 1000 R 2014's 814 mm, which may affect the comfort and ergonomics for some riders.

Both bikes have powerful braking systems with dual disc brakes at the front and four-piston calipers. The Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 features radial monobloc calipers, which provide excellent stopping power and control. The BMW S 1000 R 2014, on the other hand, has radial calipers without the monobloc design.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes are equipped with ABS and traction control. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 also features a dynamic suspension system, which adjusts the damping automatically based on the riding conditions, providing optimal performance and comfort.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same tire sizes of 120 mm at the front and 190 mm at the rear, with 17-inch wheels. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016's 15.5 liters. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 also weighs slightly less at 207 kg compared to the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016's 212 kg.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

In terms of strengths, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 stands out for its powerful and unique three-cylinder engine, powerful brakes, well-functioning electronics, excellent Öhlins suspension components, and traditional look. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 excels in its sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, excellent electronic aids, great price-to-performance ratio, and its ability to perform well on both the racetrack and rural roads.

In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 is criticized for its somewhat slow handling and high price for the R version. The BMW S 1000 R 2014, on the other hand, has been noted for its slightly rough engine operation, the stiffness of the DDC suspension system, relatively high seat height, subjective design preferences, and tempting riding experience.

In conclusion, both the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are powerful and capable naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences for power delivery, handling characteristics, and design aesthetics.