Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2017
Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Visão geral - Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 vs Yamaha MT-09 2017
The Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and capabilities.
In terms of power, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 takes the lead with a horsepower of 115, compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008's 72 horsepower. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 also has an advantage in terms of engine displacement, with 847cc compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008's 649cc. This means that the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a more powerful and larger engine, which can provide a more thrilling riding experience.
Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, which help to maintain optimal engine temperature during long rides. This is important for preventing overheating and ensuring the longevity of the engine.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
In terms of dimensions, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1440mm, compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008's 1405mm. This can contribute to better stability and handling at higher speeds. However, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 has a lower seat height at 785mm, compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2017's 815mm. This can make it more accessible and comfortable for riders of shorter stature.
When it comes to fuel capacity, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 has a larger tank with a capacity of 15.5 liters, compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2017's 14 liters. This means that the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 may have a longer range before needing to refuel.
In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 is praised for its lightweight design, precise handling, and easy maneuverability. It has a modern and dynamic appearance, making it visually appealing. The bike is also beginner-friendly, making it a good choice for riders who are new to motorcycling. Additionally, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 offers reliable ergonomics and comes equipped with ABS, providing added safety.
On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 boasts several strengths of its own. It features Öhlins suspension, which enhances the overall riding experience. The addition of an Akrapovic exhaust system improves both the aesthetics and sound of the bike. The Magura HC3 radial brake pump offers excellent braking performance. The Carbon2Race covers add a touch of grandeur to the bike's appearance. The combination of the seat, footrests, and handlebar clamps is highly effective in providing a comfortable and ergonomic riding position.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 is criticized for its uncomfortable seating position in relation to the footrests, particularly for riders over 1.80m tall. It may also not be suitable for performing wheelies, which can be a drawback for some riders.
The Yamaha MT-09 2017, on the other hand, has some drawbacks. It can be expensive to maintain and may require a significant amount of time for servicing. Certain parts may need to be registered, which can be a hassle. Additionally, the ECU Flash modification may not be legal for road use.
In conclusion, both the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 offers more power and a larger engine, making it a more thrilling ride. However, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 has its own advantages, such as its lightweight design and beginner-friendly features. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 em comparação com Yamaha MT-09 2017
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
A Kawasaki não constrói brinquedos. A ER-6N está a ficar mais séria - e continua a ser amiga dos principiantes.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Em conclusão, depois de várias paragens ao longo da época, posso olhar para trás e ver um grande resultado. Tanto em termos de desempenho como de aspeto, a nossa MT-09 é perfeita. A suspensão foi provavelmente a nossa questão mais importante. Onde antes havia claramente (demasiado) movimento na traseira em curvas rápidas, agora está tudo resolvido sem pestanejar. O amortecedor STX 46 é bastante rígido na sua configuração básica, mas também consegue aguentar a vida quotidiana sem ser desconfortável. Graças às generosas opções de ajuste, ainda há espaço para preferências e utilizações individuais. A função do cartucho NIX 30 também é impressionante. O comportamento de resposta - especialmente sob carga - melhorou significativamente. Agora também há muito mais reserva disponível durante a travagem. Onde antes a forquilha entrava em bloqueio e o ABS era acionado quando se travava a fundo com a configuração original, agora os travões simplesmente continuam a funcionar eficazmente. Para além disso, a MT-09 segue agora a linha pretendida no raio de curva como se estivesse sozinha - um puro prazer. A visão e o som do sistema completo Akrapovic também são pura alegria, e o facto de produzir mais alguns cavalos de potência é sentido de forma eficaz, especialmente no terço superior da gama de rotações. A roda dianteira dispara ainda com mais vontade para a galeria na 2ª e 3ª velocidades.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Kawasaki ER-6n vs Yamaha MT-09
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 and a Yamaha MT-09 2017. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 57 days compared to 73 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6n was published on 29/06/2005 and now has more than 11.200 views. This compares to more than 39.900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 10/06/2013.
