Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 vs. Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2015
Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2015
Vue d’ensemble - Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 vs Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2015
The Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 and the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2015 are both popular enduro motorcycles that offer a combination of on-road and off-road capabilities. While they have some similarities in terms of engine power, torque, and suspension, there are also notable differences in their technical specifications and overall performance.
Starting with the engine and drive train, the Honda Africa Twin has a bore of 92 mm and a stroke of 75.1 mm, while the Suzuki V-Strom has a slightly larger bore of 100 mm and a shorter stroke of 66 mm. In terms of power, the Honda Africa Twin offers 95 HP compared to the Suzuki V-Strom's 100 HP. However, the Africa Twin has a higher torque of 98 Nm compared to the V-Strom's 103 Nm. Both motorcycles have chain transmissions and a displacement of around 1000 cc.
In terms of suspension, both motorcycles feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a monoshock at the rear. However, the Africa Twin has a steel frame, while the V-Strom has an aluminum frame. This difference in frame material may affect the overall weight and handling of the motorcycles.
Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017
Both motorcycles come with advanced rider assistance systems, with the Africa Twin offering ABS and traction control, while the V-Strom only offers traction control. This means that the Africa Twin may provide better stability and control in various riding conditions.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Africa Twin has a slightly larger front tire diameter of 21 inches compared to the V-Strom's 19 inches. Both motorcycles have a rear tire width of 150 mm, but the V-Strom has a smaller rear tire diameter of 17 inches compared to the Africa Twin's 18 inches. The Africa Twin also has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1575 mm compared to the V-Strom's 1555 mm. In terms of weight, the Africa Twin has a kerb weight of 232 kg with ABS, while the V-Strom weighs slightly less at 228 kg.
When it comes to fuel tank capacity, the V-Strom has a larger capacity of 20 liters compared to the Africa Twin's 18.8 liters. This may provide the V-Strom with a longer range during long-distance touring.
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2015
In terms of strengths, the Africa Twin is known for its comfortable yet engaging riding experience, thanks to its perfectly dimensioned engine and comfortable seat height. On the other hand, the V-Strom is praised for its powerful engine, traction control as standard, excellent brakes, and a taut yet comfortable chassis, making it a great touring motorcycle. Additionally, the V-Strom offers complete instrumentation, providing riders with all the necessary information at a glance.
However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The Africa Twin's suspension elements are said to be too comfortably tuned at high speeds, which may affect its off-road performance. The traction control on the Africa Twin is also seen as a drawback, as it needs to be readjusted after every short break when riding off-road. As for the V-Strom, some riders have reported turbulence on the head caused by the windshield. The engine of the V-Strom is also said to run out of breath in the upper rev range, and its aesthetics are considered arbitrary.
In conclusion, the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 and the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2015 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Africa Twin offers a comfortable and engaging riding experience, while the V-Strom provides a powerful engine and great touring capabilities. Riders should consider their specific needs and preferences to determine which motorcycle suits them best.
Caractéristiques techniques Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 par rapport à Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2015
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017
Toujours aussi sensationnelle. Elle marque des points avec les vertus bien connues de Honda, mais ne devient jamais fade. Une moto qui te suit dans toutes les situations et qui ne te fatigue pas, même lors de très longues randonnées. Très robuste sur le off-road, elle franchit sans problème les passages les plus difficiles. Même en 2017, elle reste la référence parmi les enduros de voyage.
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2015
Dans le segment des grosses cylindrées, la Suzuki V-Strom 1000 occupe la position de l'offre la plus avantageuse, sans pour autant devoir renoncer à quoi que ce soit - même un contrôle de traction et un ABS sont fournis de série. D'excellents freins, un confort exceptionnel et un moteur bicylindre en V merveilleusement puissant sont des ingrédients qui devraient plaire à presque tout le monde. Le fait qu'elle ne joue pas dans la cour des grands avec ses 100 ch est compensé par le magnifique déploiement de puissance qui assure un climat détendu lors des longs voyages. Seule la protection contre le vent n'est pas optimale avec le pare-brise d'origine, il faudrait alors investir dans un pare-brise abordable et un peu plus grand.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin vs Suzuki V-Strom 1000
There are a few key differences between a Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 and a Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2015. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 is about 23% higher. Compared to Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2015 there are more Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 13 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki V-Strom 1000 with 76 days compared to 91 days for the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 47 reviews for the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin and 40 reviews for the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 since model year 2005. The first review for the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin was published on 5/12/2015 and now has more than 13,600 views. This compares to more than 6,300 views for the first review on Suzuki V-Strom 1000 published on 7/23/2002.
