Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs. Husqvarna TE 250 2016
Husaberg TE 300 2012
Husqvarna TE 250 2016
Vue d’ensemble - Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs Husqvarna TE 250 2016
The Husaberg TE 300 2012 and the Husqvarna TE 250 2016 are both enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine and drive train, the Husaberg TE 300 2012 has a larger bore of 72 mm compared to the Husqvarna TE 250 2016's 66.4 mm. This means that the Husaberg has a larger cylinder capacity at 293.2 ccm compared to the Husqvarna's 249 ccm. Both models have a single cylinder and use electric and kick starters. They also have a chain transmission.
Husaberg TE 300 2012
Both motorcycles feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension, with the same brand, WP. The rear suspension also uses WP brand components. The chassis of both models is made of steel and has a central tube frame type.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the two motorcycles have similar specifications. They both have a front tire diameter of 21 inches and a rear tire width of 140 mm. The rear tire diameter is also the same at 18 inches. The Husqvarna TE 250 2016 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1482 mm compared to the Husaberg TE 300 2012's 1475 mm. The seat height of the Husqvarna is slightly lower at 960 mm compared to the Husaberg's 985 mm. The dry weight of the Husqvarna is slightly heavier at 104.4 kg compared to the Husaberg's 103 kg. Both models have a fuel tank capacity of 11 liters.
In terms of strengths, the Husaberg TE 300 2012 has a very wide range of applications and is known for its simple but solid two-stroke technology. On the other hand, the Husqvarna TE 250 2016 is praised for its price acquisition and maintenance, performance, handling, and unbeatable performance in hard terrain.
Husqvarna TE 250 2016
As for weaknesses, the Husaberg TE 300 2012 does not have any listed weaknesses. However, the Husqvarna TE 250 2016 is mentioned to be less preferable on smooth and easy tracks, with a preference for a four-stroke engine in such conditions.
In conclusion, both the Husaberg TE 300 2012 and the Husqvarna TE 250 2016 are capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Husaberg offers a wider range of applications and reliable two-stroke technology, while the Husqvarna excels in price, performance, and handling, particularly in challenging terrains.
Caractéristiques techniques Husaberg TE 300 2012 par rapport à Husqvarna TE 250 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Husaberg TE 300 2012
La TE 300 était et reste une favorite, même dans sa nouvelle génération. Qu'il s'agisse d'une épreuve spéciale, d'un trial étroit en forêt ou d'une interminable montée en pente raide, le TE300 n'est jamais à la mauvaise place. C'est tout simplement une moto avec laquelle on ne peut pas se tromper.
Husqvarna TE 250 2016
Un tout nouveau moteur pour 2017 ! Plus léger et plus silencieux, grâce à l'arbre d'équilibrage. En termes de réactivité, la 250 se rapproche davantage de la 300. Même à bas régime, la 250 a nettement plus de punch ! La limite entre 250 et 300 est désormais très mince.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Husaberg TE 300 vs Husqvarna TE 250
There are a few key differences between a Husaberg TE 300 2012 and a Husqvarna TE 250 2016. It takes less time to sell a Husaberg TE 300 with 41 days compared to 71 days for a Husqvarna TE 250. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 2 reviews for the Husaberg TE 300 and 5 reviews for the Husqvarna TE 250 since model year 2005. The first review for the Husaberg TE 300 was published on 7/7/2010 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 16,900 views for the first review on Husqvarna TE 250 published on 10/19/2009.
