KTM 125 Duke 2020 vs. Honda CBF 125 2009
KTM 125 Duke 2020
Honda CBF 125 2009
Vue d’ensemble - KTM 125 Duke 2020 vs Honda CBF 125 2009
In comparing the KTM 125 Duke 2020 and the Honda CBF 125 2009, there are several notable differences in their technical specifications and strengths.
Starting with the technical specifications, the KTM 125 Duke 2020 boasts a more powerful engine with 15 horsepower compared to the Honda CBF 125 2009's 11 horsepower. The KTM also has slightly higher torque at 12 Nm compared to the Honda's 11.2 Nm. Both bikes have a single cylinder engine and similar displacement, with the KTM at 125cc and the Honda at 124.7cc.
When it comes to brakes, the KTM 125 Duke 2020 has four pistons in the front, providing better stopping power compared to the Honda CBF 125 2009's double piston front brake. This gives the KTM an advantage in terms of braking performance.
KTM 125 Duke 2020
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire diameter at 17 inches. However, the KTM 125 Duke 2020 has a longer wheelbase at 1367mm compared to the Honda CBF 125 2009's 1270mm. The seat height is also higher on the KTM at 830mm compared to the Honda's 792mm. The fuel tank capacity is larger on the Honda CBF 125 2009 at 13 liters compared to the KTM's 11 liters.
Moving on to their strengths, the KTM 125 Duke 2020 has a good chassis, which enhances its overall handling and stability. It also features LED indicators and headlights, providing better visibility and safety on the road. Additionally, the KTM has a TFT display, which offers a modern and informative interface for the rider.
Honda CBF 125 2009
On the other hand, the Honda CBF 125 2009 excels in terms of maneuverability, thanks to its sleek lines and compact design. It is also known for its low fuel consumption, making it an economical choice for riders.
However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The KTM 125 Duke 2020 is criticized for having little power in the lower rev range, which may affect its acceleration and performance at lower speeds. On the other hand, the Honda CBF 125 2009 has subpar braking performance, with its brake not being optimal. Additionally, the Honda has a tiny storage compartment, limiting its practicality for carrying items.
In conclusion, the KTM 125 Duke 2020 offers a more powerful engine, better braking performance, and modern features like LED indicators and a TFT display. On the other hand, the Honda CBF 125 2009 excels in maneuverability and fuel efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on the rider's priorities and preferences.
Caractéristiques techniques KTM 125 Duke 2020 par rapport à Honda CBF 125 2009
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
KTM 125 Duke 2020
Ceux qui veulent un design agressif, une performance de conduite sportive et de qualité ainsi qu'une puissance accrue, surtout dans la plage de régime supérieure, ne peuvent pas se tromper avec la Duke. L'amour du détail, comme par exemple sous la forme des clignotants LED ou de l'écran TFT sophistiqué et multifonctionnel, est une marque de fabrique de KTM. Le seul inconvénient est qu'il manque un peu de puissance à bas régime.
Honda CBF 125 2009
Grâce à sa consommation extrêmement faible, un conseil pour les économes. En ville, la CBF peut faire valoir ses points forts, mais le freinage puissant n'en fait pas partie.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché KTM 125 Duke vs Honda CBF 125
There are a few key differences between a KTM 125 Duke 2020 and a Honda CBF 125 2009. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 30. It takes less time to sell a Honda CBF 125 with 36 days compared to 71 days for the KTM 125 Duke. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 28 reviews for the KTM 125 Duke and 6 reviews for the Honda CBF 125 since model year 2009. The first review for the KTM 125 Duke was published on 5/1/2011 and now has more than 10,600 views. This compares to more than 9,800 views for the first review on Honda CBF 125 published on 9/5/2008.
