Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2017
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Vue d’ensemble - Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs Yamaha MT-09 2017
The Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and cooling systems. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a significant advantage with 115 HP compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 72 HP. The Yamaha also has a higher torque of 87.5 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 64 Nm. This difference in power and torque translates to a more exhilarating and dynamic riding experience on the Yamaha.
Both bikes have a monoshock rear suspension and double disk front brakes. However, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has an advantage in terms of its chassis. It features an aluminum frame, which is lighter and more rigid compared to the steel frame of the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013. The Yamaha also has a twin tube frame, which further enhances its handling and stability.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
In terms of tire dimensions, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a wider rear tire with a width of 180 mm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 160 mm. This wider rear tire provides better traction and stability during cornering.
The Yamaha MT-09 2017 also has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 1410 mm. This longer wheelbase contributes to the Yamaha's stability at high speeds.
In terms of weight, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 is lighter with a kerb weight of 193 kg compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 208 kg. This lighter weight contributes to the Yamaha's agility and maneuverability.
Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of around 14-16 liters, with the Kawasaki having a slightly larger capacity.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is praised for its solid handling and high-quality level. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has several strengths including an Öhlins suspension, Akrapovic exhaust for improved optics and sound, a Magura HC3 radial brake pump for excellent braking performance, and Carbon2Race covers for a grandiose appearance. The combination of seat, footrests, and handlebar clamps on the Yamaha is also highly effective.
In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is criticized for its weak brake performance. The Yamaha MT-09 2017, on the other hand, has some weaknesses such as the financial outlay required for modifications, the significant amount of working time needed for certain modifications, and the fact that some parts may need to be registered. Additionally, the ECU Flash modification on the Yamaha is not road legal.
Overall, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 offers a more powerful and dynamic riding experience with its higher engine power and torque, lighter weight, and improved chassis. However, it is important to consider the additional costs and legal implications of modifications on the Yamaha. The Kawasaki ER-6n 2013, on the other hand, provides solid handling and a high-quality level without the need for extensive modifications.
Caractéristiques techniques Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 par rapport à Yamaha MT-09 2017
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Le moteur est très puissant et amusant, et l'ER brille par sa finition japonaise soignée et son prix compétitif.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
En conclusion, après plusieurs arrêts tout au long de la saison, je peux dire que le résultat est excellent. Notre MT-09 est parfaite, tant en termes de performances que d'esthétique. Le châssis a probablement été notre point le plus important. Alors qu'il y avait auparavant beaucoup (trop) de mouvement à l'arrière dans les virages rapides, il a été repassé sans sourciller. L'amortisseur STX 46 monté est assez ferme dans sa conception de base, mais il se débrouille sans problème au quotidien sans être désagréable. Grâce aux possibilités de réglage généreuses, il y a de toute façon encore de la marge pour les préférences individuelles et l'utilisation. La fonction de la cartouche NIX 30 est également impressionnante. La réactivité s'est nettement améliorée, surtout en charge. De même, il y a maintenant beaucoup plus de réserve disponible lors du freinage sur piste. Là où, avec le réglage d'origine, la fourche se bloquait et déclenchait l'ABS en cas de freinages violents, le freinage se poursuit désormais efficacement. De plus, la MT-09 suit désormais la ligne visée dans le rayon de virage comme si elle était seule - un vrai plaisir. La vue et le son du système complet Akrapovic sont également un pur plaisir, et le fait qu'il en résulte encore quelques chevaux de plus se ressent surtout dans le tiers supérieur du régime. La roue avant s'élance encore plus volontiers dans la galerie en 2e et 3e vitesse.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Kawasaki ER-6n vs Yamaha MT-09
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and a Yamaha MT-09 2017. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 42 days compared to 73 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6n was published on 6/29/2005 and now has more than 11,200 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.
