Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020 vs. Kawasaki Z650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2017

Kawasaki Z650 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020 vs Kawasaki Z650 2017

The Kawasaki Ninja 650 model year 2020 and the Kawasaki Z650 model year 2017 share many similarities in terms of technical specifications. They both have an inline engine with a bore of 83 mm and a stroke of 60 mm. The engine power and torque are also the same, with 68.2 HP and 65.7 Nm respectively. Both bikes have a compression ratio of 10.8 and use fuel injection as their fuel system.

In terms of suspension, both the Ninja 650 and the Z650 feature a telescopic fork in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. The suspension on both bikes can be adjusted for preload. The chassis of both bikes is made of steel and has a tubular frame. They also have the same rake angle of 65.5 degrees and a trail of 100 mm.

The front brakes on both bikes are double disk with a diameter of 300 mm and double piston calipers. They also feature petal technology for improved cooling. Both bikes are equipped with ABS as an advanced rider assistance system.

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The rear tire width is 160 mm and also has a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1410 mm and the seat height is 790 mm for both bikes. However, there is a slight difference in the kerb weight with ABS. The Ninja 650 2020 weighs 193 kg, while the Z650 2017 weighs 187.1 kg. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 15 liters.

Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Ninja 650 2020 is one of the last of its kind, as many manufacturers have moved away from producing middleweight sport bikes. It has a powerful two-cylinder engine and a comfortable seat that is suitable for touring. The compact dimensions and beginner-friendly seat height make it easy to handle for riders of all skill levels. The stable chassis provides confidence-inspiring handling, and the TFT display with connectivity adds a modern touch. Lastly, the Ninja 650 2020 has a sporty look that is sure to turn heads.

On the other hand, the Z650 2017 also has its own strengths. It offers an even power delivery and a sporty chassis, making it a fun and agile bike to ride. The compact dimensions make it easy to maneuver in tight spaces. Additionally, the Z650 2017 features a negative display, which may appeal to riders who prefer a more unique and distinctive look.

Kawasaki Z650 2017

Kawasaki Z650 2017

In terms of weaknesses, the Ninja 650 2020 may be too dainty for tall riders, as it has a relatively small overall size. Some riders may also find the front brake pressure point to be less than ideal. Additionally, the Ninja 650 2020 has limited suitability for touring with two people due to its smaller size.

Similarly, the Z650 2017 may also be a little too small for tall riders, which could affect their comfort and riding experience.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020 and the Kawasaki Z650 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Ninja 650 2020 offers a more touring-oriented experience with its comfortable seat and beginner-friendly dimensions, while the Z650 2017 provides a sportier and more agile ride. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use of the bike.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020 compared to Kawasaki Z650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020
Kawasaki Z650 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power68.2 HPEngine power68.2 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque65.7 NmTorque65.7 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio10.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore36 mmThrottle Bore36 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel125 mmTravel125 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentPreload

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular
RakeRake65.5 degreeRake65.5 degree
TrailTrail100 mmTrail100 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter300 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountSemi-SchwimmsattelShock mountSemi-Schwimmsattel
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength2,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height790 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)193 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)187.1 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020

Save the sport tourer! With the Ninja 650, Kawasaki has created an exemplary representative of this class and (hopefully) solved the problem of the new generation. The stable chassis and the decent two-cylinder will delight beginners and advanced riders alike, even at a brisker pace. The front brake is a little too well intentioned, lacking a transparent pressure point despite basically good braking performance. Another plus is the TFT display, which we don't find in the competition at the moment, as well as the grown-up look, which is strongly oriented towards the larger Ninja models.

one of the last of its kind

powerful two-cylinder

comfortable seat suitable for touring

compact dimensions

beginner-friendly seat height

stable chassis

TFT display with connectivity

sporty look

Overall too dainty for tall riders

Front brake pressure point

Limited suitability for touring with two people

Kawasaki Z650 2017

Kawasaki Z650 2017

The Kawasaki Z 650 is the tip of the middle class for small male and female riders. On its compact dimensions, you probably won't feel comfortable as a giant. Heart-warming feelings, however, come from the engine, which delights with a very smooth pull. On the chassis side, a Kawasaki-typical tight set-up was chosen, which finds a great compromise in everyday use. The negative display is very easy to read and is reminiscent of its predecessor, the ER-6n - very nice!

Even power delivery

sporty chassis

compact dimensions

negative display

a little too small for tall people

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja 650 vs Kawasaki Z650

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020 and a Kawasaki Z650 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020 is about 17% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Z650 2017 there are less Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 11. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Ninja 650 with 75 days compared to 76 days for a Kawasaki Z650. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 and 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 was published on 10/4/2016 and now has more than 79,600 views. This compares to more than 25,000 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z650 published on 11/8/2016.

Price Kawasaki Ninja 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH