BMW F 700 GS 2016 vs. Honda NC750X 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

Honda NC750X 2016

Honda NC750X 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 700 GS 2016 vs Honda NC750X 2016

The BMW F 700 GS 2016 and the Honda NC750X 2016 are both enduro motorcycles that offer a combination of on-road and off-road capabilities. While they have some similarities in terms of their engine and drive train specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.

In terms of engine power, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 comes out on top with 75 HP compared to the Honda NC750X 2016's 55 HP. This makes the BMW more powerful and potentially more suitable for off-road adventures. Additionally, the BMW has a higher torque of 77 Nm compared to the Honda's 68 Nm, which can provide better acceleration and pulling power.

Both motorcycles have a chain transmission and are equipped with a 2-cylinder engine. However, the BMW has a larger displacement of 798 ccm compared to the Honda's 745 ccm. This means that the BMW may offer more overall performance and a smoother ride.

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

In terms of chassis, both motorcycles have a steel frame. However, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 has a tubular, load-bearing engine frame type, which can provide additional stability and strength. On the other hand, the Honda NC750X 2016 has a twin tube, tubular frame type, which may offer a different riding experience.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1562 mm compared to the Honda NC750X 2016's 1540 mm. This may contribute to better stability and handling for the BMW. The seat height of the BMW is also slightly lower at 820 mm compared to the Honda's 830 mm, which may make it more accessible for riders with shorter legs.

In terms of weight, the Honda NC750X 2016 is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 219 kg compared to the BMW F 700 GS 2016's 209 kg. This may affect maneuverability and agility, with the BMW potentially being easier to handle.

Both motorcycles have good braking systems, which is an important factor for safety. The BMW F 700 GS 2016 also offers a comfortable seating position, which can contribute to a more enjoyable and less fatiguing ride. Additionally, the BMW has a larger fuel tank capacity of 16 l compared to the Honda's 14.1 l, which may provide a longer range between refueling stops.

Honda NC750X 2016

Honda NC750X 2016

In terms of strengths, both motorcycles are described as very manageable, which can be beneficial for riders of various skill levels. The BMW F 700 GS 2016 is praised for its surprising power, comfortable seating position, low seat height, good brakes, and good price. On the other hand, the Honda NC750X 2016 is commended for its affordability, low fuel consumption, DCT dual-clutch transmission, adjustable driving modes, and good brakes.

As for weaknesses, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 is noted for its optics, although no specific details are provided. The Honda NC750X 2016 is criticized for its weak engine and early onset of the rev limiter, which may limit its performance capabilities.

In conclusion, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 and the Honda NC750X 2016 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers more power and potentially better off-road capabilities, while the Honda excels in terms of affordability and fuel efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's specific needs and preferences.

Technical Specifications BMW F 700 GS 2016 compared to Honda NC750X 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016
Honda NC750X 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore82 mmBore77 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke80 mm
Engine powerEngine power75 HPEngine power55 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,300 rpmRpm at Max. Power6,250 rpm
TorqueTorque77 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque4,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio10.7
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement745 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube, Tubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,280 mmLength2,210 mm
WidthWidth855 mmWidth840 mm
HeightHeight1,240 mmHeight1,285 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,562 mmWheelbase1,540 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)209 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)219 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity14.1 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

The smaller of the two F GS sisters, the F 700 GS convinces with a successful overall performance. It looks like its big sister, but at its core it is more of a lively naked bike than a big enduro. The fact that the bike has outgrown the entry-level segment can be seen in the braking system - with two brake discs at the front, it is on a par with its big 800 sister and now decelerates just as confidently. In terms of the chassis, it convinces with good suspension comfort and at the same time a firm set-up in tight bends. Upgrading is never a problem with BMW; in addition to traction control, there is also the electronic suspension ESA for the F 700 GS.

Very manageable

surprisingly powerful

comfortable seating position

low seat height

good brakes

good price.

any optics

Honda NC750X 2016

Honda NC750X 2016

With its DCT (Dual Clutch Transmission), the NC750X is the most coherent model in the NC range. With its windshield, long suspension travel and the resulting increase in comfort, it is also suitable for longer distances and even travelling. After all, why shouldn't beginners also be able to enjoy comfortable yet uncomplicated travel? Above all, the comparatively low centre of gravity takes away the fear of the visually much larger and more bulky NC750X, even for inexperienced riders. The engine is not too sporty, but the DCT, which changes gears extremely precisely and easily at the touch of a button or even fully automatically, quickly makes you forget that. The helmet compartment under the dummy tank is particularly ingenious.

very manageable

affordable

low fuel consumption

surprises no one

DCT dual-clutch transmission

adjustable driving modes

good brakes

weak engine

early onset of rev limiter

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 700 GS vs Honda NC750X

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 700 GS 2016 and a Honda NC750X 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 15. It takes less time to sell a Honda NC750X with 77 days compared to 90 days for the BMW F 700 GS. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the BMW F 700 GS and 23 reviews for the Honda NC750X since model year 2014. The first review for the BMW F 700 GS was published on 7/2/2012 and now has more than 18,800 views. This compares to more than 8,800 views for the first review on Honda NC750X published on 11/3/2013.

Price BMW F 700 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda NC750X

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHSchuberthMotorex AG