Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 vs. Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 vs Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

The Husqvarna SM 450 R and the Husaberg FS 650 E, both from the 2005 model year, are two supermoto bikes that offer different strengths and weaknesses in terms of technical specifications and overall performance.

Starting with the technical specifications, the Husqvarna SM 450 R is equipped with a 449cc single-cylinder engine that delivers 50 horsepower. On the other hand, the Husaberg FS 650 E features a larger 628cc single-cylinder engine that produces 65 horsepower. This means that the Husaberg has a more powerful engine, providing a higher level of performance and acceleration.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Husqvarna SM 450 R has a wheelbase of 1495mm, while the Husaberg FS 650 E has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1481mm. The seat height of the Husqvarna is 885mm, whereas the Husaberg has a slightly lower seat height of 870mm. When it comes to dry weight, the Husaberg is lighter at 112kg compared to the 121kg of the Husqvarna. This makes the Husaberg more agile and maneuverable, especially in tight corners and urban environments.

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Moving on to the strengths of each bike, the Husqvarna SM 450 R is praised for its supermoto geometry, which enhances its handling and cornering abilities. Its chassis is also highly regarded for its agility and responsiveness. Additionally, the Husqvarna offers a high-performance engine that is known for its rev-happy nature, providing an exhilarating riding experience.

On the other hand, the Husaberg FS 650 E is described as uncompromising racing iron, indicating its focus on performance and speed. It is also praised for its tough sound, which adds to the overall riding experience. Furthermore, the Husaberg is lighter in weight, making it easier to handle and maneuver. Its engine power, chassis, braking, and handling are all considered strong points, highlighting its capabilities as a racing bike.

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Husqvarna SM 450 R is criticized for its rancid-looking bicycle speedometer and its reliability, which may be a concern for some riders. It is also mentioned that the bike may not be suitable for everyday use, suggesting that it may not be the most practical choice for commuting or long-distance riding.

Similarly, the Husaberg FS 650 E has its drawbacks. It is noted that the noise, vibrations, and spontaneous engine overwhelming may be challenging for beginners, indicating that it may not be the most user-friendly option for inexperienced riders. Additionally, the price of the Husaberg is mentioned as a weakness, suggesting that it may be more expensive compared to other bikes in its class. The starting behavior and reliability of the bike are also mentioned as potential concerns.

In conclusion, the Husqvarna SM 450 R and the Husaberg FS 650 E have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. While the Husqvarna offers a nimble chassis and high performance, the Husaberg excels in terms of engine power, lightweight construction, and racing capabilities. However, both bikes have some reliability concerns and may not be suitable for beginners or everyday use.

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 compared to Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005
Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power50 HPEngine power65 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement449 ccmDisplacement628 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,481 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height885 mmSeat Height870 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight121 kgDry Weight112 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity9 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

In everyday use, experienced pilots immediately feel at ease and have a lot of fun zipping through the traffic. However, inexperienced pilots are somewhat overwhelmed by the spontaneous and sporty characteristics.

Supermoto geometry

handy chassis

high performance

rev-happy engine

Bicycle speedometer looks a bit rancid

reliability

not suitable for everyday use

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

The connoisseur can't stop marvelling at the Husaberg when looking at it. This is not only evident in the purchase price of almost 10,000 euros, but also in the spare parts prices for these noble add-on parts. However, the Berg also offers a famously radical riding experience.

Uncompromising racing iron

tough sound

light weight

engine power

chassis

braking

handling.

Noise, vibrations and spontaneous engine overwhelming for beginners

price

reliability

starting behaviour

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG