Husaberg FS 650 E 2005 vs. Husqvarna SM 630 2010

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husqvarna SM 630 2010

Husqvarna SM 630 2010

Loading...

Overview - Husaberg FS 650 E 2005 vs Husqvarna SM 630 2010

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husqvarna SM 630 2010

Husqvarna SM 630 2010

Technical Specifications Husaberg FS 650 E 2005 compared to Husqvarna SM 630 2010

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005
Husqvarna SM 630 2010

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement628 ccmDisplacement600 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,481 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height870 mmSeat Height910 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight112 kgDry Weight142.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity12 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

The connoisseur can't stop marvelling at the Husaberg when looking at it. This is not only evident in the purchase price of almost 10,000 euros, but also in the spare parts prices for these noble add-on parts. However, the Berg also offers a famously radical riding experience.

Uncompromising racing iron

tough sound

light weight

engine power

chassis

braking

handling.

Noise, vibrations and spontaneous engine overwhelming for beginners

price

reliability

starting behaviour

Husqvarna SM 630 2010

Husqvarna SM 630 2010

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberth