Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs. Husqvarna SM 610 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2006

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs Husqvarna SM 610 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2006

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2005 compared to Husqvarna SM 610 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2005
Husqvarna SM 610 2006

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power60 HPEngine power60 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement576 ccmDisplacement576 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,500 mmWheelbase1,500 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height920 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight140 kgDry Weight140 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.5 lFuel Tank Capacity12.5 l
Top SpeedTop Speed160 km/hTop Speed160 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Husqvarna SM 610 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2006

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG