KTM 690 SMC 2011 vs. Husqvarna SM 610 2005

KTM 690 SMC 2011

KTM 690 SMC 2011

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Loading...

Overview - KTM 690 SMC 2011 vs Husqvarna SM 610 2005

KTM 690 SMC 2011

KTM 690 SMC 2011

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Technical Specifications KTM 690 SMC 2011 compared to Husqvarna SM 610 2005

KTM 690 SMC 2011
Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power63 HPEngine power60 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement654 ccmDisplacement576 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,480 mmWheelbase1,500 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height900 mmSeat Height920 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight139.5 kgDry Weight140 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12 lFuel Tank Capacity12.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 690 SMC 2011

KTM 690 SMC 2011

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 690 SMC vs Husqvarna SM 610

Price KTM 690 SMC

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna SM 610

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH