BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs BMW S 1000 RR 2012

The BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 are both powerful motorcycles with similar technical specifications. They both have an inline four-cylinder engine with a bore of 80 mm and a stroke of 49.7 mm. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a slight advantage with 192 HP compared to the 160 HP of the BMW S 1000 R 2016. Both models have the same torque of 112 Nm, providing strong acceleration and performance.

The suspension systems of the two bikes also differ slightly. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 features an upside-down telescopic fork at the front, while the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a traditional telescopic fork. Both models have a swing arm suspension at the rear, providing stability and control.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

In terms of chassis, both models have an aluminum frame with a twin-tube design, ensuring strength and rigidity. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a slightly harder chassis compared to the BMW S 1000 RR 2012, which may affect the comfort of the ride.

Both bikes have a double disk braking system at the front with four pistons and radial technology, ensuring powerful and responsive braking. This is a strength for both models, providing excellent stopping power and control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, there are minor differences between the two models. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1439 mm compared to the 1432 mm of the BMW S 1000 RR 2012. The seat height of the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is slightly lower at 814 mm compared to the 820 mm of the BMW S 1000 RR 2012. Both models have the same kerb weight of 207 kg and fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 is commended for its complete electronic equipment, good braking system, strong engine, and its ability to be extremely fast on the road. It also has an appropriate appearance.

However, both models have their weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 has expensive optional extras that may be irresistible but can add up to the overall cost. It also has a hard chassis, which may affect the comfort of the ride. The BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a somewhat complicated chassis that takes a lot of getting used to, which may be a drawback for some riders.

Overall, both the BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 are powerful and capable motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2016 compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 R 2016
BMW S 1000 RR 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power192 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,056 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth826 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,432 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

What remains is fascination, bewilderment and fear. You can't shake the uneasy feeling that you're not quite yourself on this bike. It feels like a heavy metal concert with earplugs.

Complete, electronic equipment

good braking system

strong engine

extremely fast on the road

appropriate appearance.

Chassis somewhat complicated and takes a lot of getting used to.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs BMW S 1000 RR

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2016 and a BMW S 1000 RR 2012. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 RR 2012 is about 2% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2016 experiences a loss of 390 GBP in one year and 1,960 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 300 GBP and 430 GBP for a BMW S 1000 RR 2012. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 RR with 64 days compared to 69 days for the BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR since model year 2010. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 4,000 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 RR published on 16/04/2008.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH