Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021 vs. Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021 vs Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

When comparing the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021 and the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017, it is important to consider their technical specifications and strengths and weaknesses.

In terms of engine and drive train, both motorcycles have an in-line engine with a bore of 76 mm and a stroke of 55 mm. However, the Ninja ZX-10R has a higher engine power of 203 HP compared to the Fireblade's 192 HP. The Ninja ZX-10R also has a slightly higher torque of 114.9 Nm compared to the Fireblade's 114 Nm. Both motorcycles have a compression ratio of 13 and four cylinders with four valves per cylinder. The Ninja ZX-10R has a displacement of 998 ccm, while the Fireblade has a displacement of 999 ccm.

In terms of suspension, both motorcycles have upside-down telescopic forks in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. The front suspension has a diameter of 43 mm in both motorcycles and can be adjusted for compression, preload, and rebound. The rear suspension can also be adjusted for compression, preload, and rebound. The rear suspension material is aluminum in both motorcycles.

In terms of chassis, both motorcycles have an aluminum frame. The Ninja ZX-10R has a trail of 105 mm, while the Fireblade has a trail of 96 mm.

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021

In terms of brakes, both motorcycles have double disk brakes in the front. The Ninja ZX-10R has a larger diameter of 330 mm compared to the Fireblade's 320 mm. The Ninja ZX-10R uses Brembo brakes, while the Fireblade uses Tokico brakes. Both motorcycles have radial technology in their front brakes.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm. The front and rear tire diameters are both 17 inches. The Ninja ZX-10R has a wheelbase of 1440 mm, while the Fireblade has a wheelbase of 1405 mm. The seat height is slightly higher in the Ninja ZX-10R at 835 mm compared to the Fireblade's 832 mm. The Ninja ZX-10R also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17 liters compared to the Fireblade's 16 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Ninja ZX-10R is praised for its high-quality workmanship, strong components, high-revving and powerful engine, great wind protection with good aerodynamics, and a good seating position even for tall riders. It also has a high-quality electronics package, powerful brakes, and a well-balanced chassis.

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

The Fireblade is praised for its good brakes, low weight, and nimble handling. The engine is also noted for its power throughout the rev range, and the motorcycle has high build quality.

In terms of weaknesses, the Ninja ZX-10R is criticized for its load change reactions in the partial load range, somewhat slow quickshifter, and a somewhat small display.

The Fireblade lacks a shift assistant, and the throttle grip is described as sluggish and not very precise. The chassis is considered "nice" on the racetrack but not good enough to precisely set the scene for the great handling. It also has disadvantages at peak performance on long straights.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021 and the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Ninja ZX-10R offers high-quality workmanship, a powerful engine, and a well-balanced chassis, while the Fireblade has good brakes, nimble handling, and high build quality. Ultimately, the choice between the two motorcycles will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021 compared to Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore76 mmBore76 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke55 mm
Engine powerEngine power203 HPEngine power192 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,200 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpm
TorqueTorque114.9 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,400 rpmRpm at Torque11,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio13
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital, Transistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter43 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
TrailTrail105 mmTrail96 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter330 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, PetalTechnologyradial, Monoblock
BrandBrandBremboBrandTokico

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,065 mm
WidthWidth750 mmWidth720 mm
HeightHeight1,185 mmHeight1,125 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height832 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021

Kawasaki offers a mature overall package with the Ninja ZX-10R in the 2021 model year, which with the new front end also really looks like 2021. The bike offers surprisingly good space for the rider and you feel comfortable in the saddle. The rev-happy engine leaves nothing to be desired - except perhaps more discipline in the part-load range. To make the project a success, Kawasaki relies on high-quality ingredients: Showa suspension, Öhlins steering dampers, Brembo brakes with 330 discs and high-quality electronics. Thanks to the good electronics and the superior engine, the Ninja ZX-10R even cuts quite a figure on country roads - as long as you are willing to suffer a little in terms of seating position due to the concept.

High-quality workmanship

strong components

high-revving and powerful engine

great wind protection including good aerodynamics

good seating position even for tall riders

high-quality electronics package

powerful brakes

well-balanced chassis.

Load change reactions in the partial load range

somewhat slow quickshifter

somewhat small display

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

A worthy new edition from Honda. Even if it doesn't quite shine as brightly in the standard version as it does with the Öhlins Gold in the "SP" version, the Fireblade is a much better bike in 2017. The electronics package is good, the handling great and the seating position very good. The bike looks like a unified whole and will make Honda fans happy.

Good brakes

Low weight and nimble handling

Engine has plenty of power from the rev range

High build quality

No shift assistant

sluggish and not very precise throttle grip

chassis "nice" on the racetrack but not good enough to precisely set the scene for the great handling

disadvantages at peak performance on long straights

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R vs Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2021 and a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017. It takes less time to sell a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade with 112 days compared to 177 days for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 51 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R and 71 reviews for the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade since model year 2005. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R was published on 11/01/2004 and now has more than 2,900 views. This compares to more than 3,700 views for the first review on Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade published on 25/11/2003.

Price Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGSchuberthcalimoto GmbH