Husqvarna TE 310 2013 vs. Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 310 2013 vs Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 310 2013 compared to Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna TE 310 2013
Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke55 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio12.9
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement297 ccmDisplacement297 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandMarzocchi

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandMarzocchi

Brakes Front

TechnologyTechnologyWaveTechnologyWave

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight111 kgDry Weight111 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG