SWM RS 300 R 2016 vs. Husqvarna TE 310 2013

SWM RS 300 R 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Loading...

Overview - SWM RS 300 R 2016 vs Husqvarna TE 310 2013

SWM RS 300 R 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Technical Specifications SWM RS 300 R 2016 compared to Husqvarna TE 310 2013

SWM RS 300 R 2016
Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke55 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement298 ccmDisplacement297 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandKayabaBrandMarzocchi

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandKayabaBrandMarzocchi

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight107 kgDry Weight111 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGSchuberthcalimoto GmbH