Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs. Husqvarna TE 300 2024

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husqvarna TE 300 2024

Husqvarna TE 300 2024

Loading...

Overview - Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs Husqvarna TE 300 2024

The Husaberg TE 300 2012 and the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 are both enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. They have the same bore and stroke measurements, starter type, number of cylinders, and engine displacement. Both models also feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and WP brand for both the front and rear suspensions.

However, there are some notable differences between the two models. The Husaberg TE 300 2012 has a steel frame, while the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 has a chromium-molybdenum frame. The frame type of the Husqvarna is a double cradle, central tube, which provides a practical chassis setup for a wide range of uses. This gives the Husqvarna a robust overall appearance and unbeatable balance between handling, weight, and performance.

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 has a slightly longer wheelbase compared to the Husaberg TE 300 2012. The seat height of the Husqvarna is also lower, providing better ergonomics in the saddle and more room to move on the bike. However, the Husqvarna has a slightly higher dry weight compared to the Husaberg.

The fuel tank capacity of the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 is smaller than that of the Husaberg TE 300 2012. The Husqvarna has an 8.5-liter fuel tank, while the Husaberg has an 11-liter capacity. This means that the Husqvarna may require more frequent refueling during long rides.

When it comes to strengths, the Husaberg TE 300 2012 is praised for its wide range of applications and simple but solid two-stroke technology. On the other hand, the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 is commended for its practical chassis setup, great traction, precise lines, low vibration level in the saddle, and robust overall appearance. It also offers very practical details, low weight, great ergonomics in the saddle, and a high-quality chassis. The Husqvarna also has an unbeatable balance between handling, weight, and performance, with a 2-stroke engine that has excellent engine tuning and running culture. It performs exceptionally well on steep slopes, with good traction and surprisingly low tendency to wheelie.

Husqvarna TE 300 2024

Husqvarna TE 300 2024

In terms of weaknesses, the Husaberg TE 300 2012 does not have any listed weaknesses. On the other hand, the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 has a few weaknesses mentioned. The plastics in the boot area can quickly look worn, and the prices of the Husqvarna range are considered to be on the expensive side. Additionally, the recessed grip on the seat is positioned too far forward, and the stand can be a bit fiddly to fold out. Some riders also find the Husqvarna to be tiring to ride on longer passages.

Overall, both the Husaberg TE 300 2012 and the Husqvarna TE 300 2024 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would depend on individual preferences and priorities, such as the desired chassis setup, ergonomics, and budget.

Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 300 2012 compared to Husqvarna TE 300 2024

Husaberg TE 300 2012
Husqvarna TE 300 2024

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke72 mm
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement293.2 ccmDisplacement293.2 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeDouble cradle, Central tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,487 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height985 mmSeat Height950 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight103 kgDry Weight106.4 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity8.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

The TE 300 was and remains a favourite, even in the new generation. Whether it's a special stage, narrow forest trials or endless steep slope climbs, the TE300 is never out of place. Simply a bike with which you can't go wrong.

Very wide range of applications

simple but solid two-stroke technology.

none

Husqvarna TE 300 2024

Husqvarna TE 300 2024

The 300 2-stroke is always a pleasure. Sure, it's exhausting to move the bike over longer stages. At the end of the day, it still requires more concentration and energy than a 4-stroke. But the 300 is heavenly light downhill and as strong as an ox uphill. With the new 2-stroke engine, it has become even better and will certainly collect some trophies in the extreme enduro sector.

Practical chassis setup for a wide range of uses

Great traction

Precise lines

Low vibration level in the saddle

Robust overall appearance

Very practical details

Low weight

Great ergonomics in the saddle

Lots of room to move on the bike

High-quality chassis

Unbeatable balance between handling, weight and performance

2-stroke engine with really good engine tuning

Very great running culture from the engine

Very great performance on steep slopes - good traction, surprisingly low tendency to wheelie

Plastics in the boot area quickly look very worn

Prices are normally always a matter of opinion - in this case, however, the whole range seems good but expensive

The recessed grip on the seat is too far forward

Stand has to be folded out a bit fiddly

A bit tiring to ride on longer passages

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husaberg TE 300 vs Husqvarna TE 300

There are a few key differences between a Husaberg TE 300 2012 and a Husqvarna TE 300 2024. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna TE 300 with 21 days compared to 41 days for the Husaberg TE 300. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 2 reviews for the Husaberg TE 300 and 6 reviews for the Husqvarna TE 300 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husaberg TE 300 was published on 07/07/2010 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 6,800 views for the first review on Husqvarna TE 300 published on 03/11/2013.

Price Husaberg TE 300

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TE 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG