Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs. Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Overview - Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Beta RR 300 2T 2015

MTR, Fastway, Rothewald & Co. at Louis Moto

TOP SELECTION AT FAVORABLE PRICES

Details

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 300 2015 compared to Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	72 mm	Bore	72 mm
Stroke	Stroke	72 mm	Stroke	72 mm
Starter	Starter	Electric, Kick	Starter	Kick
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Ignition	Ignition	Kokusan	Ignition	CDI, Kokusan
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	293.2 ccm	Displacement	293.1 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Steel	Frame	Steel
Frame type	Frame type	Central tube	Frame type	Double cradle

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	80 %	Rear tyre height	80 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,482 mm	Wheelbase	1,482 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	960 mm	Seat Height	930 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	104.6 kg	Dry Weight	104 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	11 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

The racing machine for two-stroke enthusiasts. Perfectly tuned and fast as an arrow. A bestseller in the Husvqarna range! And rightly so! In the test, we also tried it in combination with a Rekluse clutch. But the overall package seemed a little too nervous. The TE300 is best enjoyed with a conventional clutch.

Lightweight, powerful, extremely fast

engine easy to control

lots of traction in the lower rev range, power for every situation in the upper rev range

inexpensive to run, hardly any service costs

reliable! The huge engine runs 95% of the time at partial load anyway.

More nervous and strenuous on connecting stages than a four-stroke

lower range than with four-stroke