BMW S 1000 RR 2011 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 RR 2011 vs BMW S 1000 R 2016

The BMW S 1000 RR model year 2011 and the BMW S 1000 R model year 2016 are both impressive motorcycles from BMW, but they have some notable differences.

Starting with the engine and drive train, both models have an inline four-cylinder engine with the same bore and stroke measurements of 80 mm and 49.7 mm respectively. However, the S 1000 RR 2011 has a higher engine power of 192 HP compared to the S 1000 R 2016 which has 160 HP. Both models have a torque of 112 Nm and a compression ratio of 12 or 13. The displacement is also the same at 999 ccm.

In terms of suspension, the S 1000 RR 2011 has a telescopic fork for the front suspension, while the S 1000 R 2016 has an upside-down telescopic fork. Both models have a swing arm for the rear suspension. The chassis is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame in both models.

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

The braking system is also similar in both models, with double disk brakes at the front and four pistons. The technology used is radial, providing excellent braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both models have the same front and rear tire widths of 120 mm and 190 mm respectively. The wheelbase is slightly longer in the S 1000 R 2016 at 1439 mm compared to the S 1000 RR 2011 which has a wheelbase of 1432 mm. The seat height is also slightly lower in the S 1000 R 2016 at 814 mm compared to 820 mm in the S 1000 RR 2011. Both models have a kerb weight of 207 kg and a fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The S 1000 RR 2011 has improved driveability with an optimized torque curve, providing plenty of power and a strong engine. It also has a good traction point and an immaculately functioning shift assist. However, one weakness of this model is that the accelerating load can be very fatiguing.

On the other hand, the S 1000 R 2016 has a powerful and well-controllable engine, making it a joy to ride. It also has a powerful braking system and a comfortable seating position. However, some weaknesses of this model are that it offers expensive optional extras that may be irresistible but add to the overall cost, and the chassis is quite hard, which may affect the overall comfort of the ride.

In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 RR 2011 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 are impressive motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The S 1000 RR 2011 offers improved driveability and a strong engine, while the S 1000 R 2016 provides a well-controllable engine and a comfortable seating position. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 RR 2011 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 RR 2011
BMW S 1000 R 2016
Show all
Same only
Differences
BMW S 1000 RR 2011
BMW S 1000 RR 2011
BMW S 1000 R 2016
BMW S 1000 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power192 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,750 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
LengthLength2,056 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth826 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,432 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

The most important changes to the S 1000 RR, however, were the numerous small adjustments to the chassis and geometry. Here we now benefit from thousands of test kilometres from the BMW test crew. This is logical evolution and a great step forward.

Improved driveability - optimised torque curve

plenty of power

strong engine

good traction point

immaculately functioning shift assist.

Accelerating load is very fatiguing.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 RR vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 RR 2011 and a BMW S 1000 R 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 13% higher. A BMW S 1000 RR 2011 experiences a loss of 1,610 GBP in one year and 2,140 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 390 GBP and 1,960 GBP for a BMW S 1000 R 2016. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016 there are less BMW S 1000 RR 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 RR with 47 days compared to 69 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the BMW S 1000 RR was published on 16/04/2008 and now has more than 4,000 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen