Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 vs. BMW S 1000 RR 2020

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

BMW S 1000 RR 2020

BMW S 1000 RR 2020

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 vs BMW S 1000 RR 2020

The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 and the BMW S 1000 RR 2020 are both supersport motorcycles with powerful engines and advanced features.

In terms of engine specifications, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 has an in-line 4-cylinder engine with a displacement of 636cc. It produces 131 horsepower and 71 Nm of torque. The engine has a compression ratio of 12.9 and a bore and stroke of 67mm and 45.1mm, respectively. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 RR 2020 also has an in-line 4-cylinder engine but with a larger displacement of 999cc. It delivers a higher power output of 207 horsepower and 113 Nm of torque. The engine has a compression ratio of 13.3 and a bore and stroke of 80mm and 49.7mm, respectively.

Both motorcycles feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and adjustable compression, preload, and rebound settings for both the front and rear suspensions. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and has a twin tube design. The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 has a perimeter and extruded frame type, while the BMW S 1000 RR 2020 has a load-bearing engine frame type.

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

In terms of braking, both motorcycles have double disc brakes at the front with radial technology. The BMW S 1000 RR 2020 also has an advanced rider assistance system that includes ABS, riding modes, launch control, ride by wire, quickshifter, and traction control. The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013, on the other hand, only has traction control as an advanced rider assistance system.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 has a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 180mm. The front and rear tires have a diameter of 17 inches. It has a wheelbase of 1395mm and a seat height of 830mm. The kerb weight of the bike with ABS is 194kg and it has a fuel tank capacity of 17 liters. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 RR 2020 has a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 190mm. The front and rear tires also have a diameter of 17 inches. It has a longer wheelbase of 1441mm and a slightly lower seat height of 824mm. The kerb weight of the bike with ABS is 197kg and it has a slightly smaller fuel tank capacity of 16.5 liters.

BMW S 1000 RR 2020

BMW S 1000 RR 2020

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 is praised for its sharpened geometry, good handling, and uncompromising reliability. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 RR 2020 is commended for its very linear power delivery, wide rev range, excellent DDC (Dynamic Damping Control), and a comprehensive electronics package. It is also considered to be a harmonious overall package both on the road and on the racetrack.

As for weaknesses, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 is criticized for its high purchase price. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 RR 2020 is said to be somewhat "characterless" compared to other bikes in its class and lags behind on the spec sheet in direct comparison.

In summary, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 and the BMW S 1000 RR 2020 are both high-performance supersport motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 offers good handling and reliability, while the BMW S 1000 RR 2020 provides a powerful and controllable engine, advanced electronics, and a well-rounded package. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2020

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013
BMW S 1000 RR 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore67 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke45.1 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power131 HPEngine power207 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,500 rpm
TorqueTorque71 NmTorque113 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,500 rpmRpm at Torque10,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio13.3
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement636 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Perimeter, ExtrudedFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountSemi-SchwimmsattelShock mountFloating caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradial, Monoblock, PetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsTraction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,073 mm
WidthWidth705 mmWidth846 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,395 mmWheelbase1,441 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height824 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)194 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)197 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity16.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

The Kawa convinces with its good handling and uncompromising reliability. A strong motorbike, but definitely not a bargain.

Sharpened geometry

seating position okay

good handling

uncompromising reliability.

High purchase price.

BMW S 1000 RR 2020

BMW S 1000 RR 2020

A real "all-rounder" superbike. The BMW knows how to play to its strengths both on the race track and on the country road. Thanks to variable camshaft control, the powerful engine is already convincing at the bottom end and accelerates harmoniously across the entire rev range, with plenty of power in every range. For the hobby pilot, the chassis certainly functions excellently in every situation, provides transparent feedback and offers many adjustment options. The seating position is sporty yet relatively comfortable. The electronics work very harmoniously without patronising the rider - TOP!

Very linear power delivery, which makes it particularly controllable. Wide rev range and pleasant control

thanks to ShiftCam, there is also plenty of pressure in the lower rev range

excellent DDC - precision and TOP performance

super electronics package

harmonious overall package both on the road and on the racetrack

In part, the bike seems almost a bit "characterless" compared to the Aprilia and Honda

In direct comparison, the bike lags a bit behind on the spec sheet

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 vs BMW S 1000 RR

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 and a BMW S 1000 RR 2020. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 RR with 68 days compared to 122 days for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 and 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR since model year 2010. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 was published on 03/12/2012 and now has more than 20,800 views. This compares to more than 4,000 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 RR published on 16/04/2008.

Price Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH