Beta Urban 125 2010 vs. Beta Urban 125 2016

Beta Urban 125 2010

Beta Urban 125 2010

Beta Urban 125 2016

Beta Urban 125 2016

Loading...

Overview - Beta Urban 125 2010 vs Beta Urban 125 2016

Beta Urban 125 2010

Beta Urban 125 2010

Beta Urban 125 2016

Beta Urban 125 2016

Technical Specifications Beta Urban 125 2010 compared to Beta Urban 125 2016

Beta Urban 125 2010
Beta Urban 125 2016

Engine and Drive Train

StrokeStroke63 mmStroke54 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10 Compression Ratio10
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height100 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter16 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
LengthLength2,010 mmLength2,010 mm
WidthWidth800 mmWidth800 mm
HeightHeight310 mmHeight1,115 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,372 mmWheelbase1,345 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height835 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight101 kgDry Weight101 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity6 lFuel Tank Capacity6 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH