Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 vs. BMW F 800 R 2009

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 vs BMW F 800 R 2009

The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 and the BMW F 800 R 2009 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and front brake configurations. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a higher output with 106 HP compared to the BMW F 800 R 2009's 87 HP. This means that the Triumph offers more acceleration and overall performance. The Triumph also has a slightly lower torque of 68 Nm compared to the BMW's 86 Nm, but this difference may not be noticeable in everyday riding.

Another notable difference is the number of cylinders and engine displacement. The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a 3-cylinder engine with a displacement of 675 ccm, while the BMW F 800 R 2009 has a 2-cylinder engine with a displacement of 798 ccm. The extra cylinder in the Triumph provides smoother power delivery and potentially better overall engine performance.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW F 800 R 2009 has a longer wheelbase of 1520 mm compared to the Triumph's 1410 mm. This may result in slightly better stability and handling for the BMW. However, the Triumph has a lower seat height of 800 mm compared to the BMW's 820 mm, which may be more comfortable for shorter riders.

When it comes to fuel tank capacity, the BMW F 800 R 2009 has a larger tank with a capacity of 19 liters compared to the Triumph's 17.4 liters. This means that the BMW may have a longer range before needing to refuel.

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 is praised for its taut and playful chassis, agile handling, low weight, powerful brakes, and overall comfort. On the other hand, the BMW F 800 R 2009 is known for its high-quality components, great engine performance, possibility for good equipment, a well-designed cockpit, positive chassis feedback, and low fuel consumption.

However, both models have their weaknesses. The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has been criticized for its slightly brute brake application towards the end, which may require some getting used to. The BMW F 800 R 2009, on the other hand, has been noted for its high price, a first gear that is a little too long, and some criticisms regarding its aesthetics.

In conclusion, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 and the BMW F 800 R 2009 are both capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Triumph offers higher engine power and a more compact design, while the BMW provides high-quality components and good fuel efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 compared to BMW F 800 R 2009

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
BMW F 800 R 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore74 mmBore82 mm
StrokeStroke52.3 mmStroke75.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power87 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,850 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque68 NmTorque86 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,750 rpmRpm at Torque6,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
DisplacementDisplacement675 ccmDisplacement798 ccm

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength2,145 mm
WidthWidth740 mmWidth905 mm
HeightHeight1,060 mmHeight1,160 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,520 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height820 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.4 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

If you're looking for a lively naked bike in the mid-range segment that's especially fun for sporty rides on country roads, the Street Triple 675 R is the perfect choice. Whether the manageable surcharge for the R pays off should be decided according to whether you really want to adjust the chassis or leave it in the well-chosen basic setup anyway.

Taut, playful chassis

agile

low weight

powerful brake

comfort offered.

Brake application a little brute towards the end.

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

In the advertisements, the new BMW F 800 R sometimes comes across as a woman's motorbike. This does not do the bike an injustice, but the civilised engine, the low seat height and the smooth controls certainly suit petite ladies.

High-quality components

great engine

good equipment possible

cockpit

positive chassis

low consumption.

High price

first gear a little too long

optics.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R vs BMW F 800 R

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 and a BMW F 800 R 2009. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 675 R with 52 days compared to 58 days for a BMW F 800 R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R and 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R was published on 20/07/2008 and now has more than 13,000 views. This compares to more than 8,900 views for the first review on BMW F 800 R published on 10/10/2008.

Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 800 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG