Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 vs. BMW F 800 R 2017

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

BMW F 800 R 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 vs BMW F 800 R 2017

The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 and the BMW F 800 R 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line configurations, and liquid cooling systems. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 has a higher output with 106 HP compared to the BMW F 800 R 2017's 90 HP. This gives the Triumph a slight advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed. However, the BMW compensates for this with a higher torque rating of 86 Nm compared to the Triumph's 68 Nm. This means the BMW may offer better low-end power and torque delivery.

Both bikes have similar suspension setups with upside-down telescopic forks at the front. The chassis of the Triumph features a twin-tube design, while the BMW has a twin-tube load-bearing engine frame. Both bikes also have four-piston radial brakes at the front, providing strong stopping power. However, the Triumph is noted for its brute brakes, which may require more skill to handle, making it less suitable for beginners.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW F 800 R 2017 has a longer wheelbase of 1520 mm compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014's 1410 mm. This longer wheelbase may contribute to better stability and handling at higher speeds for the BMW. The seat height of the BMW is slightly lower at 790-820 mm, making it more accessible for riders of varying heights. However, the Triumph has a lower kerb weight of 183 kg compared to the BMW's 202 kg, which may contribute to better maneuverability and agility.

The fuel tank capacity of the Triumph is larger at 17.4 liters compared to the BMW's 15 liters. This gives the Triumph a longer range before needing to refuel.

BMW F 800 R 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 is praised for its extremely easy handling, rev-happy engine, wonderful three-cylinder sound, brute brakes, and cool streetfighter look. On the other hand, the BMW F 800 R 2017 is known for its strong brakes, upgraded equipment, low weight, accessible geometry, and characteristic sound.

In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph is criticized for its hard chassis with modest comfort, a slightly weak engine at the bottom end, loudness over time, and brakes that may not be entirely suitable for beginners. The BMW, on the other hand, is described as somewhat pragmatic, with a lack of effervescence.

Overall, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 may appeal to riders who prioritize performance, aggressive styling, and a thrilling riding experience. The BMW F 800 R 2017, on the other hand, may be more suited for riders looking for a well-equipped, lightweight, and accessible naked bike with a characteristic sound.

Technical Specifications Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 compared to BMW F 800 R 2017

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014
BMW F 800 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore74 mmBore82 mm
StrokeStroke52.3 mmStroke75.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power90 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,850 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque68 NmTorque86 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,750 rpmRpm at Torque5,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.02
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement675 ccmDisplacement798 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength2,145 mm
WidthWidth740 mmWidth860 mm
HeightHeight1,060 mmHeight1,235 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,520 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height790,770,820 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight183 kgKerb Weight202 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.4 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Every motorcyclist will love the Street Triple R. It was built by enthusiasts. It was built by enthusiasts and conveys the pure pleasure of riding a motorbike without being too demanding.

Extremely easy to handle

rev-happy engine

wonderful three-cylinder sound

brute brakes

cool streetfighter look.

Hard chassis with modest comfort

engine a little weak at the bottom

quite loud over time

brakes not entirely suitable for beginners.

BMW F 800 R 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

With a EURO4 engine, new riding modes, new instruments and new colours, the F 800 R starts the new season. It is recognisable at first glance only by the end cap on the stately stainless steel exhaust. It is one of those full-grown motorbikes that, despite its considerable sporting potential, was designed for the widest possible user group. Therefore, it is absolutely beginner-friendly (throttled), but can also inspire an experienced audience. Its character remains somewhat pragmatic, but the unmistakable, hollow sound of the inline two compensates for this.

strong brakes

upgraded equipment

low weight

accessible geometry

characteristic sound

somewhat pragmatic

effervescence is a little lacking

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R vs BMW F 800 R

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 and a BMW F 800 R 2017. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 675 R with 60 days compared to 105 days for a BMW F 800 R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R and 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R was published on 20/07/2008 and now has more than 13,000 views. This compares to more than 8,900 views for the first review on BMW F 800 R published on 10/10/2008.

Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 800 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH