Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 vs. Triumph Street Scrambler 2017

Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022

Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022

Triumph Street Scrambler 2017

Triumph Street Scrambler 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 vs Triumph Street Scrambler 2017

The Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 and the Triumph Street Scrambler 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, fuel systems, and cooling systems. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 has a higher horsepower rating of 68.2 HP compared to the Triumph Street Scrambler 2017, which has 55 HP. This means that the Z650 RS may offer more acceleration and top speed capabilities.

In terms of torque, the Triumph Street Scrambler 2017 has a higher rating of 80 Nm compared to the Z650 RS's 65.7 Nm. Higher torque generally translates to better low-end power and acceleration, making the Street Scrambler potentially more suitable for off-road riding.

Both bikes have a two-cylinder engine configuration and use fuel injection systems. This ensures efficient fuel delivery and improved performance.

Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022

Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspensions at the rear. However, the Street Scrambler 2017 has dual shock absorbers at the rear, which may provide better off-road performance and shock absorption compared to the Z650 RS's monoshock.

Both bikes have steel frames, but the Z650 RS features a tubular frame while the Street Scrambler has a central tube frame. The choice of frame design can affect the bike's overall weight distribution and handling characteristics.

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disc brakes at the front with double piston calipers. The Z650 RS has slightly smaller front brake discs with a diameter of 300 mm compared to the Street Scrambler's 310 mm discs. However, the difference in size may not significantly impact braking performance.

Both bikes are equipped with ABS, which is an advanced rider assistance system that helps prevent wheel lock-up during braking, providing improved safety.

Triumph Street Scrambler 2017

Triumph Street Scrambler 2017

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Street Scrambler 2017 has a larger front tire diameter of 19 inches compared to the Z650 RS's 17-inch front tire. Additionally, the Street Scrambler has a slightly smaller rear tire width of 150 mm compared to the Z650 RS's 160 mm. The Street Scrambler also has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 12 liters compared to the Z650 RS's 15 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Z650 RS 2022 is praised for its perfectly realized retro design, analogue displays, lively engine, accessible handling, powerful brakes, comfortable ergonomics, adjustable levers, and eye-catching appearance. On the other hand, the Street Scrambler 2017 is commended for its harmonious appearance, well-fitting engine, and unexpectedly good off-road performance.

In terms of weaknesses, the Z650 RS 2022 is criticized for its slightly softer sound, while the Street Scrambler 2017 is noted for its footrests touching down relatively early on the road.

Overall, the Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 and the Triumph Street Scrambler 2017 offer different strengths and weaknesses, catering to different riding preferences. The Z650 RS may appeal to riders looking for a retro-styled bike with sporty performance, while the Street Scrambler may be more suitable for riders seeking a versatile bike with off-road capabilities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 compared to Triumph Street Scrambler 2017

Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022
Triumph Street Scrambler 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line crankpin offset
BoreBore83 mmBore84.6 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke80 mm
Engine powerEngine power68.2 HPEngine power55 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power5,900 rpm
TorqueTorque65.7 NmTorque80 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque3,230 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio10.55
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears5
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement900 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel125 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberDual Shock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentCompression, Preload

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeCentral tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountSemi-SchwimmsattelShock mountFloating caliper

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter200 mmDiameter255 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,415 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity12 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022

Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022

With the RS, Kawasaki proves that it has mastered the art of retro bikes. You immediately forget that underneath the pretty dress is the normal Z650, because thanks to the right details, the retro design has been convincingly implemented. In the saddle, you enjoy the accessibility that you know from the technical sister. A retro bike that both beginners and experienced bikers will really enjoy!

perfectly realised retro design

analogue displays

lively engine,accessible handling

powerful brakes

comfortable ergonomics

adjustable levers

real eye-catcher

slightly softer sound

Triumph Street Scrambler 2017

Triumph Street Scrambler 2017

Extremely coherent machine with a very wide range of uses and a great experience factor.

Very harmonious appearance

perfectly fitting engine

unexpectedly good off-road performance

Footrests touch down relatively early on the road

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z650 RS vs Triumph Street Scrambler

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z650 RS 2022 and a Triumph Street Scrambler 2017. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 34. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Scrambler with 82 days compared to 146 days for the Kawasaki Z650 RS. Since model year 2022 1000PS.de editors have written 12 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 RS and 9 reviews for the Triumph Street Scrambler since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Z650 RS was published on 27/09/2021 and now has more than 39,300 views. This compares to more than 49,900 views for the first review on Triumph Street Scrambler published on 08/11/2016.

Price Kawasaki Z650 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Scrambler

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGSchuberthcalimoto GmbH