KTM 250 EXC-F 2017 vs. Husqvarna TE 250 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2017

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Overview - KTM 250 EXC-F 2017 vs Husqvarna TE 250 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2017

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Technical Specifications KTM 250 EXC-F 2017 compared to Husqvarna TE 250 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2017

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2017

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	78 mm	Bore	66.4 mm
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Electric, Kick
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork
Brand	Brand	WP	Brand	WP

Suspension Rear

Shock mount	Shock mount	direct	Shock mount	Deflection
Brand	Brand	WP	Brand	WP

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Steel	Frame	Steel
Frame type	Frame type	Central tube	Frame type	Central tube

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	80 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	100 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	80 %	Rear tyre height	80 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,482 mm	Wheelbase	1,482 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	960 mm	Seat Height	960 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	103 kg	Dry Weight	104.4 kg

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 250 EXC-F 2017

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter, thanks to the balancer shaft. In terms of responsiveness, the 250 moves more towards 300. The 250 also has significantly more punch in the lower rev range! The limits between 250 and 300 are now vanishingly small.

Price acquisition

price maintenance

performance

handling

unbeatable in hard terrain

I would prefer a four-stroke on smooth and easy tracks