Husaberg FE 250 2013 vs. Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husaberg FE 250 2013

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Overview - Husaberg FE 250 2013 vs Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husaberg FE 250 2013

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Technical Specifications Husaberg FE 250 2013 compared to Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husaberg FE 250 2013

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husaberg FE 250 2013

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	76 mm	Bore	66.4 mm
Stroke	Stroke	54.8 mm	Stroke	72 mm
Starter	Starter	Kick	Starter	Electric, Kick
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	248.6 ccm	Displacement	249 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork
Brand	Brand	WP	Brand	WP

Suspension Rear

Brand	Brand	WP	Brand	WP

Chassis

Frame type	Frame type	Double cradle, Perimeter	Frame type	Central tube

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	80 %	Rear tyre height	80 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,482 mm	Wheelbase	1,482 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	970 mm	Seat Height	960 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	107.5 kg	Dry Weight	104.4 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg FE 250 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter, thanks to the balancer shaft. In terms of responsiveness, the 250 moves more towards 300. The 250 also has significantly more punch in the lower rev range! The limits between 250 and 300 are now vanishingly small.

Price acquisition

price maintenance

performance

handling

unbeatable in hard terrain

I would prefer a four-stroke on smooth and easy tracks