Kawasaki Z900 2021 vs. Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018

Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2021 vs Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018

In terms of engine and drive train, both the Kawasaki Z900 2021 and the Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018 have inline engines with liquid cooling. However, the Z900 has a slightly smaller engine displacement of 948cc compared to the Speed Triple RS's 1050cc. The Speed Triple RS also has a higher engine power of 150 HP compared to the Z900's 125.4 HP. However, the Z900 has a higher torque of 98.6 Nm compared to the Speed Triple RS's 117 Nm. Both bikes have fuel injection systems and 4 cylinders.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks in the front. The Z900 offers adjustment options for preload and rebound, while the Speed Triple RS offers additional compression adjustment. In the rear, both bikes have swing arm suspensions with monoshock absorbers. The Z900 offers adjustment options for preload and rebound, while the Speed Triple RS offers additional compression adjustment. The Speed Triple RS also has an aluminum swing arm, while the Z900's swing arm material is not specified.

In terms of chassis, the Z900 has a steel frame with a double cradle design, while the Speed Triple RS has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design.

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Both bikes have double disk brakes in the front, with the Z900 having a diameter of 300mm and the Speed Triple RS having a larger diameter of 320mm. Both bikes have four-piston calipers and advanced braking technologies such as petal (Z900) and radial monoblock (Speed Triple RS).

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes offer ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control.

Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018

Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. The Z900 has a rear tire width of 180mm and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches, while the Speed Triple RS has a wider rear tire width of 190mm. The Z900 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450mm compared to the Speed Triple RS's 1445mm. The Z900 also has a lower seat height of 795mm compared to the Speed Triple RS's 825mm.

In terms of strengths, the Z900 2021 is praised for its powerful four-cylinder engine, intuitive handling, good equipment, aggressive looks, and value for money. On the other hand, the Speed Triple RS 2018 is praised for its new technology, well-functioning electronic aids, proven engine further developed for more power and speed, high-quality chassis, many adjustment options, comfortable seating position, and many optional equipment options.

In terms of weaknesses, the Z900 2021 lacks a quickshifter option and is considered to be behind competitors with 6-axis IMU electronically. The Speed Triple RS 2018 is criticized for its lack of a windshield, high weight, and little ground clearance.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2021 compared to Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2021
Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power150 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque117 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque7,150 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.92
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSingle swing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel140 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake67.1 degree
TrailTrail105 mmTrail91.3 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter255 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth775 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,070 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,445 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height825 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

In terms of price-performance, the Kawasaki Z900 is hard to beat at the moment. With the perfectly tuned engine, the high-quality chassis components and the electronics added for 2020, this naked bike offers everything that sporty riders will be looking for. There is really nothing to complain about, except for the lack of a quickshifter option.

powerful four-cylinder

intuitive handling

good equipment

aggressive looks

value for money

No quickshifter option

competitors with 6-axis IMU electronically ahead.

Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018

Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018

The new Speed Triple has a few things over its predecessor. It is stronger and smarter than the old model, revs higher and is lighter. Switching to the new model is worthwhile if you value these aspects and have the necessary change at hand. In return, you get a versatile motorbike that combines riding comfort for longer country road rides with the riding fun you want for the racetrack. Agile, handy, smart and powerful. This is the best way to describe the Speedy and it will definitely find at least as much favour among its fans as its predecessor.

New technology

Well-functioning electronic aids

Proven engine further developed

More power and speed

High-quality chassis

Many adjustment options

Comfortable seating position

Many optional equipment options

Lack of windshield

High weight

Little ground clearance

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Triumph Speed Triple RS

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2021 and a Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018 is about 35% higher. Compared to Triumph Speed Triple RS 2018 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2021 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 33 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple RS with 80 days compared to 107 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 8 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple RS since model year 2018. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 93,300 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple RS published on 05/02/2018.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH