Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 vs. BMW S 1000 RR 2010
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
BMW S 1000 RR 2010
Overview - Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 vs BMW S 1000 RR 2010
The Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 and the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 are both supersport motorcycles with powerful engines and similar displacements of 999cc. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 has a slight advantage with 192 HP compared to the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005's 178 HP. This higher power output gives the BMW an edge in terms of overall performance and acceleration.
Both motorcycles have four cylinders, which provide smooth and balanced power delivery. This configuration is common in high-performance sport bikes and ensures optimal performance.
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1432 mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005's 1405 mm. This longer wheelbase can contribute to better stability and handling at high speeds.
The seat height of the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 is slightly higher at 820 mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005's 810 mm. This may be more comfortable for taller riders, but it could also make it slightly more difficult for shorter riders to reach the ground.
In terms of weight, the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 is slightly heavier with a dry weight of 183 kg compared to the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005's 166 kg. This additional weight could affect the agility and maneuverability of the BMW, especially in tight corners.
Both motorcycles have fuel tank capacities that are suitable for long rides, with the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 having a slightly larger capacity of 18 liters compared to the BMW S 1000 RR 2010's 17.5 liters.
BMW S 1000 RR 2010
In terms of strengths, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 has a slim appearance, improved performance due to increased cam lift, an anti-hopping clutch, and excellent handling. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 boasts superior performance, well-functioning driving aids, and a very fast acceleration. Additionally, the BMW is considered to have an optimal price for its class.
However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 is not an oversized motorbike, which may not appeal to riders who prefer larger bikes. Additionally, the seat height is set a little too low, which may not be comfortable for taller riders. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 is criticized for its agility, complicated handling, and lower braking stability due to its higher weight.
In conclusion, while both the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 and the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 are high-performance supersport motorcycles, they have distinct differences in terms of power, dimensions, and strengths. Riders should consider their preferences and riding style to choose the motorcycle that best suits their needs.
Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2010
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
To sum up: "An absolutely awesome box that could actually be worth Euro 15,599!" The workmanship is good, the performance is high and the driving experience is very good.
BMW S 1000 RR 2010
We have a strict and merciless order from the boss to thank for that. There are tough performance checks before the S 1000 RR leaves the factory. At BMW, they didn't want to show their hand and risk even one disappointing test bench report finding its way into the media.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-R 1000 vs BMW S 1000 RR
There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 and a BMW S 1000 RR 2010. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 with 47 days compared to 52 days for a BMW S 1000 RR. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 71 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 and 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR since model year 2010. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 was published on 03/03/2004 and now has more than 7,100 views. This compares to more than 4,000 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 RR published on 16/04/2008.
