Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011 vs. Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2008
Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2008
Přehled - Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011 vs Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2008
The Suzuki GSX-R 600 model year 2011 and the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade model year 2008 are both supersport motorcycles that offer thrilling rides and impressive performance. However, they differ in several aspects, including engine power, displacement, seat height, and fuel tank capacity.
Starting with the Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011, this bike is equipped with a 599cc engine that produces 125 horsepower. It features a four-cylinder configuration, which ensures smooth power delivery and efficient performance. The relatively low weight of the GSX-R 600 enhances its agility and provides a safe driving feeling. With a wheelbase of 1400mm, it offers stability and maneuverability. The seat height of 810mm is comfortable for most riders, and the fuel tank capacity of 17 liters allows for decent range.
Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011
On the other hand, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2008 boasts a more powerful engine with a displacement of 998cc and an output of 172 horsepower. Like the GSX-R 600, it also has a four-cylinder configuration, ensuring smooth power delivery and excellent performance. The Fireblade excels in alternating curves, thanks to its optimal handling and precision. It offers easy handling, making it suitable for riders of different skill levels. The bike's sophisticated appearance is a notable strength, and its brake system and clutch provide reliable stopping power and smooth gear shifting. With a wheelbase of 1400mm, it shares the same stability and maneuverability as the GSX-R 600. The seat height is slightly higher at 831mm, and the fuel tank capacity is 18 liters, offering a slightly larger range.
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2008
Despite their strengths, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Suzuki GSX-R 600 may not be as powerful as some other bikes in its class, making it relatively slow on the straights and less suitable for racetrack use. On the other hand, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade, while powerful and precise, may not provide an overly purposeful feeling to some riders. Additionally, the ride comfort on the Fireblade is limited, which may affect long-distance journeys.
In conclusion, the Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011 and the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2008 are both impressive supersport motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The GSX-R 600 offers a safe driving feeling, agility, and a low weight, while the Fireblade delivers a powerful engine, optimal handling, and a sophisticated appearance. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes depends on the rider's preferences, intended use, and riding style.
Technické údaje Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011 ve srovnání s Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2008
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011
Nadprůměrná ovladatelnost a bezstarostné akcelerační manévry s vozem Suzuki to s vámi tak nějak udělají! Pro nováčky na okruhu je to dobrý motocykl, který stojí za zvážení, protože je snadno ovladatelný, odpouští chyby a má také dostatečný výkon, který se navíc snadno ovládá!
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2008
Honda v roce 2008 překvapila velmi nízkou hmotností a nápadně nenápadným, ale exkluzivním designem.
Srovnání cen průměrná tržní cena Suzuki GSX-R 600 vs Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade
There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011 and a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2008. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 5. It takes less time to sell a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade with 51 days compared to 68 days for the Suzuki GSX-R 600. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 31 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-R 600 and 71 reviews for the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade since model year 2005. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-R 600 was published on 11/21/2002 and now has more than 2,900 views. This compares to more than 3,700 views for the first review on Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade published on 11/25/2003.
