Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016

The Kawasaki Z900 2017 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line 4-cylinder engines. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a clear advantage with 160 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2017's 125.4 HP. This means that the BMW offers more raw power and acceleration, making it a better choice for riders who prioritize speed and performance.

Similarly, the torque on the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is higher at 112 Nm compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2017's 98.6 Nm. This higher torque allows for better low-end power and acceleration, making the BMW more responsive and easier to handle in various riding conditions.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 comes with the added advantage of a dynamic suspension system, which provides better control and stability during cornering and braking.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

The chassis of the Kawasaki Z900 2017 is made of steel, while the BMW S 1000 R 2016 features an aluminum frame. The aluminum frame offers better rigidity and lighter weight, resulting in improved handling and maneuverability for the BMW.

Both bikes have double disc brakes at the front with four pistons, ensuring powerful and reliable braking performance. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has the advantage of radial brake technology, which provides better modulation and control during braking.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1450 mm compared to the BMW S 1000 R 2016's 1439 mm. The seat height on the BMW is also slightly higher at 814 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 795 mm. However, the difference in wheelbase and seat height is minimal and may not significantly impact the riding experience.

In terms of weight, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is slightly lighter with a kerb weight of 207 kg compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2017's 210 kg. This lighter weight contributes to better agility and maneuverability for the BMW.

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 is praised for its ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and a well-balanced engine with good torque. It is also considered to offer a great balance between performance, price, and practicality.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is praised for its powerful and controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comfortable seating position.

As for weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 is noted to have a narrow knee angle, which may be uncomfortable for taller riders. However, this can be addressed by ordering a different seat.

The BMW S 1000 R 2016 is noted to have expensive optional extras, which may make it less accessible for some riders. Additionally, the chassis is described as being on the harder side, which may result in a slightly less comfortable ride.

Overall, both the Kawasaki Z900 2017 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kawasaki offers a good balance between performance and practicality, while the BMW provides more power and advanced features. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's priorities and preferences.