Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have an in-line three-cylinder engine with a power output of 135 HP and a torque of 111 Nm. The engine displacement is also the same at 1050 ccm, and both bikes have liquid cooling.

In terms of suspension, the Speed Triple 1050 2013 has a Showa upside-down telescopic fork at the front and a Showa suspension at the rear. The Speed Triple R 2012, on the other hand, has an Öhlins telescopic fork at the front and an Öhlins suspension at the rear. Both bikes have adjustable compression and rebound settings for the suspension.

The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame. The front brakes of both bikes have four pistons and are of the radial technology, with Brembo being the brand. The front brakes of the Speed Triple R 2012 also have monoblock technology, which provides additional stability and precision.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters, as well as the same wheelbase, seat height, and fuel tank capacity.

The Speed Triple 1050 2013 has a powerful three-cylinder engine, which provides a sporty driving feel. The upright seating position and stable frame contribute to a comfortable and confident riding experience.

The Speed Triple R 2012, on the other hand, has a flawless racing chassis that offers very precise handling. The bike's inspiring looks, great engine, and stable brakes make it a desirable choice for riders looking for a high-performance naked bike.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

However, the Speed Triple 1050 2013 has some weaknesses. The Showa suspension elements can be slightly uncomfortable, and the bike's handling can be stubborn at times.

Similarly, the Speed Triple R 2012 has its weaknesses. It requires wide radii for turns, making it somewhat complicated to ride in tight corners. Additionally, there may be some weaknesses in terms of comfort.

In conclusion, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 are powerful and capable naked bikes. The Speed Triple 1050 2013 offers a sporty driving feel and a stable frame, while the Speed Triple R 2012 has a flawless racing chassis and great engine performance. However, both bikes have their weaknesses, such as uncomfortable suspension and complicated handling in the case of the Speed Triple 1050 2013, and the need for wide radii and potential comfort issues in the case of the Speed Triple R 2012.