Honda CBF 1000 2006 vs. Honda CBF 600 S 2007
Honda CBF 1000 2006
Honda CBF 600 S 2007
Genel bakış - Honda CBF 1000 2006 vs Honda CBF 600 S 2007
The Honda CBF 1000 model year 2006 and the Honda CBF 600 S model year 2007 are both motorcycles manufactured by Honda. While the CBF 1000 is a sport touring motorcycle, the CBF 600 S is a naked bike. In terms of technical specifications, there are some notable differences between the two models.
Starting with the engine and drive train, the CBF 1000 2006 is equipped with a more powerful engine, producing 98 horsepower compared to the CBF 600 S 2007's 78 horsepower. Both motorcycles have a 4-cylinder, 4-stroke engine, and chain transmission. However, the CBF 1000 has a larger displacement of 998ccm, while the CBF 600 S has a displacement of 599ccm. Additionally, the CBF 1000 has liquid cooling, while the CBF 600 S has air cooling.
Honda CBF 1000 2006
Moving on to the dimensions and weights, the CBF 1000 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1483mm compared to the CBF 600 S's 1480mm. The seat height of the CBF 1000 is also slightly higher at 780mm, while the CBF 600 S has a seat height of 770mm. In terms of weight, the CBF 600 S is lighter, with a dry weight of 198kg, while the CBF 1000 weighs 228kg. Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of 19 liters.
Now, let's discuss the strengths of each model. The CBF 1000 2006 is praised for its well-functioning and merciful brakes, as well as its quiet and smooth yet relatively powerful engine. These features contribute to a comfortable and focused riding experience. On the other hand, the CBF 600 S 2007 is known for its uncomplicated operation, easy handling, and technical revisions. It is also lighter and has a stiff and robust construction, providing a comfortable ride. Additionally, the CBF 600 S is equipped with ABS, enhancing safety.
Honda CBF 600 S 2007
However, both models have their weaknesses. The CBF 1000 2006 has a neat but unspectacular chassis, and its lean angle clearance quickly reaches its limit with a sporty riding style. On the other hand, the CBF 600 S 2007 has no significant changes to its aesthetics, which may be seen as a drawback for riders looking for an updated design.
In conclusion, the Honda CBF 1000 2006 and the Honda CBF 600 S 2007 are two different motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The CBF 1000 offers a more powerful engine and a sport touring design, while the CBF 600 S is a lighter naked bike with easy handling and technical revisions. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the rider's preferences and intended use.
Teknik Özellikler Honda CBF 1000 2006 ile karşılaştırıldığında Honda CBF 600 S 2007
Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri
Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri
Honda CBF 1000 2006
Göze çarpmayan ayrintilarin toplami mükemmel dengeli bir motosikletle sonuçlanir. Avrupa motosikletlerini sevenler "çok steril, çok az karakterli" diyebilir. CBF bir Tuono'yu, bir Monster'i veya bir MV'yi garajdan disari itemez ve itmeyecektir. Mutlu sahibini her gün garajdan disari ve asfalta iter.
Honda CBF 600 S 2007
CBF her iki yönde de her açidan olumlu bir gelisme göstermistir. Yeni baslayanlar, deneyimsiz sürücüler veya sadece motosiklet sürmeyi ögrenen veya yeniden ögrenen kisiler, yeni modele alismayi ve giderek daha güvenli sürüs davranislari edinmeyi kolay bulacaklardir.
Fiyat Karşılaştırması Ortalama Piyasa Fiyatı Honda CBF 1000 vs Honda CBF 600 S
There are a few key differences between a Honda CBF 1000 2006 and a Honda CBF 600 S 2007. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 16. It takes less time to sell a Honda CBF 600 S with 53 days compared to 60 days for the Honda CBF 1000. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Honda CBF 1000 and 5 reviews for the Honda CBF 600 S since model year 2005. The first review for the Honda CBF 1000 was published on 5/16/2006 and now has more than 53,200 views. This compares to more than 22,200 views for the first review on Honda CBF 600 S published on 7/26/2005.
