KTM 790 Duke 2020 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2013

The KTM 790 Duke 2020 and the KTM 690 Duke 2013 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and capabilities. Starting with the KTM 790 Duke 2020, it boasts a powerful engine with 105 HP and a displacement of 799ccm. This two-cylinder engine provides a high-revving performance, allowing for exhilarating rides. In comparison, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 has a single-cylinder engine with 68 HP and a displacement of 690ccm. While it may not have as much power as the 790 Duke, it still offers sufficient power for most riders.

Both models feature liquid cooling, ensuring optimal engine temperature regulation. This is crucial for maintaining performance and preventing overheating during long rides. Additionally, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks for their front suspension, providing excellent stability and control. The front suspension on both models is branded by WP, a reputable manufacturer known for producing high-quality suspension systems.

In terms of chassis, both the KTM 790 Duke 2020 and the KTM 690 Duke 2013 feature a chromium-molybdenum frame. This type of frame is known for its strength and durability, providing a solid foundation for the bikes. However, it is worth noting that the 790 Duke offers chassis adjustment options, allowing riders to fine-tune the bike's handling to their preferences. The 690 Duke, on the other hand, does not offer this capability, potentially limiting customization options.

KTM 790 Duke 2020

When it comes to braking, both models have four-piston front brakes with radial technology. This brake setup ensures powerful and responsive stopping power, enhancing safety and control on the road. Additionally, both bikes offer advanced rider assistance systems. The KTM 790 Duke 2020 comes equipped with ABS, riding modes, and traction control, providing additional safety features for riders. The KTM 690 Duke 2013 features ride-by-wire technology, which enhances throttle response and control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, there are minimal differences between the two models. Both have a front tire width of 120mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. The KTM 790 Duke 2020 has a slightly wider rear tire with a width of 180mm, compared to the 160mm width of the KTM 690 Duke 2013. Both bikes have a wheelbase of around 1470mm, providing stability and agility on the road. The seat height of the 790 Duke is slightly lower at 825mm, while the 690 Duke has a seat height of 835mm. Both models have a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters, allowing for decent range during rides.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 790 Duke 2020 offers a quickshifter as standard, allowing for seamless gear changes. It also has a great chassis set-up and playful handling, making it a joy to ride. The high-quality electronics package, including ABS, riding modes, and traction control, adds to the overall safety and performance of the bike. Additionally, the TFT display provides clear and detailed information to the rider. Lastly, the 790 Duke offers a good price/performance ratio, making it an attractive option for riders.

KTM 690 Duke 2013

On the other hand, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 has the advantage of being lightweight, making it agile and easy to maneuver. It also has sufficient power for most riders and boasts low fuel consumption, making it an economical choice for daily commuting or long rides.

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 790 Duke 2020 has the limitation of having the suspension spring preload adjustable at the rear only. This may limit the customization options for riders who prefer to fine-tune their suspension settings. The KTM 690 Duke 2013, on the other hand, does not offer any chassis adjustment options, potentially limiting the comfort and customization for riders.

In conclusion, both the KTM 790 Duke 2020 and the KTM 690 Duke 2013 have their unique strengths and weaknesses. The 790 Duke offers a more powerful engine, advanced rider assistance systems, and chassis adjustment options. On the other hand, the 690 Duke is lightweight, fuel-efficient, and offers sufficient power for most riders. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the rider's preferences and intended use of the bike.