Suzuki GSR 600 2006 vs. Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
Suzuki GSR 600 2006
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
Genel bakış - Suzuki GSR 600 2006 vs Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
The Suzuki GSR 600 model year 2006 and the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 model year 2005 are both motorcycles produced by Suzuki. While they share some similarities, they also have distinct differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths.
Starting with the technical specifications, the Suzuki GSR 600 2006 is equipped with a 599cc engine that produces 98 horsepower. It has a liquid cooling system and features four cylinders. The wheelbase measures 1400mm, the seat height is 785mm, and the dry weight is 183kg. The fuel tank capacity is 16.5 liters.
On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 boasts a more powerful engine, with a displacement of 999cc and an output of 178 horsepower. It also has a liquid cooling system and four cylinders. The wheelbase is slightly longer at 1405mm, and the seat height is higher at 810mm. The dry weight is lighter than the GSR 600 at 166kg, and the fuel tank capacity is larger at 18 liters.
Suzuki GSR 600 2006
In terms of strengths, the Suzuki GSR 600 2006 is known for its rev-hungry engine, which provides a lively and stable riding experience. It is also praised for its excellent overall package, offering a well-rounded combination of performance and handling.
On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 stands out for its slim appearance and improved performance. It features increased cam lift, which enhances its power output. Additionally, it boasts an anti-hopping clutch and superior braking capabilities, contributing to its exceptional handling.
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The Suzuki GSR 600 2006 lacks wind protection, which can be a disadvantage for riders looking for a more comfortable and protected riding experience. Additionally, some riders may prefer a USD (upside-down) fork for improved suspension performance.
Similarly, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 has its drawbacks. While it offers impressive performance, it may not be suitable for riders who prefer oversized motorcycles. Furthermore, the seat height is set a little too low for some riders, potentially causing discomfort during long rides.
In conclusion, the Suzuki GSR 600 2006 and the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 have distinct characteristics and strengths. The GSR 600 excels in its rev-hungry engine and overall package, while the GSX-R 1000 stands out with its slim appearance, improved performance, and exceptional handling. However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses, such as the GSR 600's lack of wind protection and the GSX-R 1000's lower seat height. Ultimately, the choice between these two models depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Teknik Özellikler Suzuki GSR 600 2006 ile karşılaştırıldığında Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri
Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri
Suzuki GSR 600 2006
Çiplak Suzuki'de hiçbir sinirsel alandan kaçinilmamistir. Yolda, yüksek kaliteli motor ve sasinin keyfini çikarabilirsiniz. Dar virajlarda süper çevik, genis virajlarda ise hizli ve dengeli.
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
Özetle sunu söyleyebiliriz: "15.599 € degerinde olabilecek kesinlikle harika bir motosiklet!" Isçilik iyi, performans yüksek ve sürüs deneyimi gerçekten çok iyi.
Fiyat Karşılaştırması Ortalama Piyasa Fiyatı Suzuki GSR 600 vs Suzuki GSX-R 1000
There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSR 600 2006 and a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 7. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 with 47 days compared to 57 days for the Suzuki GSR 600. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 15 reviews for the Suzuki GSR 600 and 71 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 since model year 2005. The first review for the Suzuki GSR 600 was published on 2/18/2005 and now has more than 4,100 views. This compares to more than 7,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-R 1000 published on 3/3/2004.
