Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006 vs. Yamaha R1 2006
Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006
Yamaha R1 2006
Genel bakış - Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006 vs Yamaha R1 2006
The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R and the Yamaha R1, both from the 2006 model year, are two popular supersport motorcycles that offer impressive performance and features. While they share similarities in terms of engine power, displacement, and cylinder count, there are notable differences between the two.
Starting with the technical specifications, both bikes have a 998cc engine with four cylinders. The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R boasts a slightly higher engine power of 175 HP compared to the Yamaha R1's 172 HP. This slight difference in power may not be significant in everyday riding, but it could be noticeable during high-performance situations.
Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006
In terms of dimensions and weights, the two bikes have a similar wheelbase, with the Yamaha R1 measuring slightly longer at 1395mm compared to the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R's 1390mm. The seat height of the Yamaha R1 is also slightly higher at 835mm, while the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R offers a seat height of 825mm. The dry weight of the Yamaha R1 is marginally lighter at 172kg, while the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R weighs 173kg. Additionally, the Yamaha R1 has a slightly larger fuel tank capacity of 18 liters compared to the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R's 17 liters.
Moving on to the strengths of each bike, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is praised for its great gearbox, strong engine, and overwhelming power. Its chassis and Öhnling's steering damper contribute to excellent handling, while the anti-hopping clutch and good workmanship are additional advantages.
On the other hand, the Yamaha R1 is commended for its no-worry riveting, strong braking system, and powerful engine. It is also known for its traction miracle and features an anti-hopping clutch and steering damper, which enhance its overall performance. The Yamaha R1 is often described as precise in its handling.
Yamaha R1 2006
However, both bikes have their weaknesses as well. The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R's seating position may pose a challenge for smaller riders, as they may struggle to keep their weight over the tank when accelerating. On the other hand, the Yamaha R1 is criticized for its uncomfortable posture due to a sub-optimal seating position. Additionally, some riders find that the Yamaha R1 requires strong body effort during turns.
In conclusion, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R and the Yamaha R1, both from the 2006 model year, offer impressive performance and features. While the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R has a slightly higher engine power and a lower seat height, the Yamaha R1 is known for its strong braking system and precise handling. Both bikes have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Teknik Özellikler Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006 ile karşılaştırıldığında Yamaha R1 2006
Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri
Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri
Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006
Motor performansindaki liderlik ve bir önceki modele kiyasla sürüs kabiliyetindeki kuantum siçramasi, onu zafer için gerçek bir rakip haline getiriyor.
Yamaha R1 2006
Yeni R1, yüksek teknoloji ve yeniliklerle dolu bir motosiklettir. Yaris pistindeki performansi etkileyici. Teknik araçlar sürüs keyfi ve tur sürelerine dönüsüyor. Bununla birlikte, motosikletin yorucu olmasini önlemek için aktif bir sürücü gerekir.
Fiyat Karşılaştırması Ortalama Piyasa Fiyatı Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R vs Yamaha R1
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2006 and a Yamaha R1 2006. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha R1 with 44 days compared to 60 days for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 51 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R and 80 reviews for the Yamaha R1 since model year 2005. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R was published on 1/11/2004 and now has more than 2,900 views. This compares to more than 3,900 views for the first review on Yamaha R1 published on 4/28/2003.
