Ducati Monster 696 2011 vs. Suzuki SV 650 2016
Ducati Monster 696 2011
Suzuki SV 650 2016
Genel bakış - Ducati Monster 696 2011 vs Suzuki SV 650 2016
The Ducati Monster 696 2011 and the Suzuki SV 650 2016 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some key differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Ducati Monster 696 2011 has a slight advantage with 80 HP compared to the Suzuki SV 650 2016's 76 HP. Similarly, the Ducati Monster 696 2011 also has a higher torque of 69 Nm compared to the Suzuki SV 650 2016's 64 Nm. Both bikes have 2 cylinders and a monoshock rear suspension.
Ducati Monster 696 2011
When it comes to cooling, the Ducati Monster 696 2011 uses air cooling while the Suzuki SV 650 2016 uses liquid cooling. This difference may affect the overall performance and temperature management of the bikes.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter. However, the Ducati Monster 696 2011 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450 mm compared to the Suzuki SV 650 2016's 1445 mm. The seat height of the Ducati Monster 696 2011 is also slightly lower at 770 mm compared to the Suzuki SV 650 2016's 785 mm. Additionally, the Ducati Monster 696 2011 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 15 liters compared to the Suzuki SV 650 2016's 13.8 liters.
In terms of strengths, the Ducati Monster 696 2011 is praised for its low but relaxed seat height, relatively low overall weight, robustness, agility, and fun riding experience. It also has a good braking system. On the other hand, the Suzuki SV 650 2016 is commended for its agile and powerful engine, typical V2 sound, pleasant and low seating position, easy handling, comfortable chassis, and brakes with good control.
Suzuki SV 650 2016
However, both bikes also have their weaknesses. The Ducati Monster 696 2011 can sometimes be difficult to handle, and its digital instruments are poorly readable. Similarly, the Suzuki SV 650 2016 has a poorly readable digital tachometer.
In conclusion, while both the Ducati Monster 696 2011 and the Suzuki SV 650 2016 have their strengths and weaknesses, they offer similar performance and features. The choice between the two would ultimately depend on personal preference and specific requirements.
Teknik Özellikler Ducati Monster 696 2011 ile karşılaştırıldığında Suzuki SV 650 2016
Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri
Karşılaştırıldığında Artıları ve eksileri
Ducati Monster 696 2011
Touring sürücüleri, gezginler ve senkronize sürücüler, bagaj sistemleri için montaj seçeneklerinin olmamasi ve pillion'daki sinirli alan nedeniyle bundan hoslanmayacaktir. Bununla birlikte, modern sehir sakinleri, hareketli kir sakinleri ve çaliskan hafta sonu sporu meraklilari 696'yi amaca uygun yaglayici olarak bulacaktir - ve nispeten uygun bir fiyata.
Suzuki SV 650 2016
Yeni SV650, ilk iki SV650 neslinin görsel minimalizmini devam ettiriyor, ancak teknik olarak dogrudan selefi olan SFV650 Gladius'u temel aliyor - son derece modern SV650'yi bir klasige dönüstüren iki mükemmel hamle. Tasarim, birçok retro dönüsüm çagina harika bir sekilde uyuyor, ancak içinde özellikle yeni baslayanlar için baslamayi kolaylastiran modern hileler de var. Öte yandan motor, ileri düzey sürücüleri de ikna edebilir, tipik V2 hissi harikadir. Sasi ve frenlerden asiri sportiflik beklememelisiniz, ancak 6400 Euro'nun biraz altindaki fiyat (Almanya'da) rekabetin yutmak zorunda kalacagi bir duyuru.
Fiyat Karşılaştırması Ortalama Piyasa Fiyatı Ducati Monster 696 vs Suzuki SV 650
There are a few key differences between a Ducati Monster 696 2011 and a Suzuki SV 650 2016. It takes less time to sell a Ducati Monster 696 with 66 days compared to 80 days for a Suzuki SV 650. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 9 reviews for the Ducati Monster 696 and 25 reviews for the Suzuki SV 650 since model year 2005. The first review for the Ducati Monster 696 was published on 11/8/2007 and now has more than 7,300 views. This compares to more than 14,200 views for the first review on Suzuki SV 650 published on 9/26/2008.
