Kawasaki Z 800 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-10 2016

The Kawasaki Z 800 model year 2013 and the Yamaha MT-10 model year 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, inline four-cylinder engines. However, there are several notable differences between the two motorcycles.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-10 takes the lead with 160 horsepower, compared to the Kawasaki Z 800's 113 horsepower. This significant difference in power output gives the Yamaha MT-10 an advantage in terms of acceleration and overall performance.

The torque figures also favor the Yamaha MT-10, with 111 Nm compared to the Kawasaki Z 800's 83 Nm. This higher torque allows the Yamaha MT-10 to deliver strong and responsive acceleration, making it a thrilling ride.

Both motorcycles feature liquid cooling systems, ensuring optimal engine performance and preventing overheating during long rides. Additionally, they both have four cylinders, providing smooth power delivery and a balanced ride.

In terms of suspension, both motorcycles feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. This type of suspension provides better stability and control, especially during aggressive riding.

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

The chassis of the Kawasaki Z 800 is made of steel and has a double cradle design. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 features an aluminum frame with a Deltabox design. The aluminum frame offers a lightweight and rigid structure, contributing to the Yamaha MT-10's agility and high-speed stability.

Both motorcycles have double disc brakes at the front, providing powerful and reliable stopping power. This is crucial for confident and safe riding, especially at high speeds.

In terms of tire dimensions, both motorcycles have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Yamaha MT-10 has a wider rear tire at 190 mm, compared to the Kawasaki Z 800's 180 mm. This wider rear tire contributes to the Yamaha MT-10's stability and grip during cornering.

The wheelbase of the Kawasaki Z 800 is slightly longer at 1445 mm, compared to the Yamaha MT-10's 1400 mm. This longer wheelbase provides a more relaxed and stable ride on the Kawasaki Z 800.

In terms of seat height, the Yamaha MT-10 has a slightly lower seat height at 825 mm, compared to the Kawasaki Z 800's 834 mm. This lower seat height on the Yamaha MT-10 may be more suitable for shorter riders or those who prefer a lower riding position.

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of 17 liters, allowing for decent range and fewer fuel stops during long rides.

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z 800 has an eye-catching, chunky look that appeals to riders who prefer a more aggressive and muscular design. It also offers confident acceleration and relaxed geometry, making it suitable for both city commuting and spirited riding. Additionally, the Kawasaki Z 800 has powerful brakes, providing excellent stopping power when needed.

On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 has a CP4 engine that delivers a strong character and exhilarating performance. It is extremely agile, allowing for quick and precise maneuvers in tight corners. The Yamaha MT-10 also offers high-speed stability, making it suitable for both urban and highway riding. Furthermore, it has strong brakes and an unmistakable sound, adding to the overall riding experience.

In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z 800 has limited freedom of movement for the legs, which may be uncomfortable for taller riders or those who prefer a more spacious riding position. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 has poor comfort, limited wind protection, and a hard fit, which may not be ideal for long rides or riders who prioritize comfort.

In conclusion, while both the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 and the Yamaha MT-10 2016 are powerful naked bikes with similar engine types, the Yamaha MT-10 offers higher performance, agility, and stability. However, the Kawasaki Z 800 has its own strengths in terms of its eye-catching design, confident acceleration, and powerful brakes. Ultimately, the choice between the two motorcycles will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.