Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin Adventure Sports 2018 vs. KTM 790 Adventure 2020

In terms of engine and drive train, both the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin Adventure Sports 2018 and the KTM 790 Adventure 2020 have in-line engines with similar power outputs of 95 HP. However, the Africa Twin has a larger displacement of 998cc compared to the 799cc of the KTM. The Africa Twin also has a slightly higher torque of 98 Nm compared to the 88 Nm of the KTM. Both bikes have electric starters and chain transmissions.

When it comes to suspension, the Africa Twin features an upside-down telescopic fork with a diameter of 45 mm and a travel of 252 mm in the front, while the rear suspension is a swing arm with a monoshock from Showa, offering a travel of 240 mm. On the other hand, the KTM 790 Adventure has a front suspension with a slightly smaller diameter of 43 mm and a travel of 200 mm. The rear suspension is also a swing arm with a monoshock, offering the same travel as the front at 200 mm. Both bikes have adjustable suspension settings.

In terms of chassis, the Africa Twin has a steel frame, while the KTM 790 Adventure features a chromium-molybdenum frame. Both bikes have double disk brakes in the front.

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin Adventure Sports 2018

Both the Africa Twin and the KTM 790 Adventure come equipped with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Africa Twin has a larger front tire diameter of 21 inches compared to the 21-inch front tire of the KTM. Both bikes have the same rear tire width of 150 mm and rear tire diameter of 18 inches. The Africa Twin has a longer wheelbase of 1580 mm compared to the 1509 mm of the KTM. The seat height of the Africa Twin is higher at 900 mm, with the option to increase it to 920 mm, while the KTM has a lower seat height of 830 mm, with the option to increase it to 850 mm. The Africa Twin also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 24.2 liters compared to the 20-liter capacity of the KTM.

Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin Adventure Sports 2018 has a powerful and unagitated engine, providing a smooth and enjoyable ride. Its comfortable chassis and seating position make it suitable for long rides. Additionally, the Africa Twin has a visually appealing design and is equipped with good brakes and a large fuel tank for extended adventures. It also offers performance modes and the option for a dual-clutch transmission (DCT), providing versatility for different riding preferences.

On the other hand, the KTM 790 Adventure 2020 has an engine that combines manners and character, offering a unique riding experience. Its chassis stability is remarkably high, providing confidence and control on various terrains. The brakes on the KTM are also highly reliable. It excels in off-road capabilities, making it a great choice for adventurous riders. Additionally, the KTM has a low average consumption, making it more fuel-efficient.

KTM 790 Adventure 2020

However, the Africa Twin does have some weaknesses. It lacks optimal wind protection, which can be a drawback for riders looking for better aerodynamics. It also does not have cruise control, which may be missed by riders who prefer long-distance touring. Additionally, the high saddle height of the Africa Twin can make it difficult for smaller riders to climb on. Another drawback is that the ABS on the front wheel cannot be switched off, limiting the control options for advanced riders.

As for the KTM 790 Adventure, it has a few weaknesses as well. The surcharge policy for optional features can be unattractive for potential buyers. The original seat shape may not be optimally comfortable for some riders.

In conclusion, both the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin Adventure Sports 2018 and the KTM 790 Adventure 2020 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Africa Twin offers a powerful engine, comfortable chassis, and a large fuel tank, while the KTM provides a unique riding experience, excellent off-road capabilities, and fuel efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.