KTM 690 Duke 2008 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2008

KTM 690 Duke 2008

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

Loading...

Преглед - KTM 690 Duke 2008 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

The KTM 690 Duke 2008 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 takes the lead with its 106 HP engine, compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2008's 65 HP engine. The Triumph's three-cylinder engine provides a livelier performance and a distinct Tyrolean sound, while the KTM's single-cylinder engine is significantly weaker. This results in the Triumph offering a more exhilarating ride and better acceleration.

Both bikes feature liquid cooling systems, ensuring optimal performance even during long rides. This feature helps to prevent overheating and ensures a consistent engine temperature. Additionally, both models have high-quality components and strong braking systems, providing excellent stopping power and safety.

KTM 690 Duke 2008

KTM 690 Duke 2008

In terms of dimensions and weights, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 has a longer wheelbase of 1472 mm, compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016's 1410 mm wheelbase. This longer wheelbase contributes to the KTM's stability, making it a reliable choice for riders who prioritize stability and control. However, the Triumph's shorter wheelbase allows for extremely agile handling, making it a nimble and responsive bike.

The seat height of the KTM 690 Duke 2008 is 865 mm, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 has a lower seat height of 800 mm. This lower seat height on the Triumph makes it more accessible for riders with shorter inseams or those who prefer a lower riding position.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 has a larger tank, holding 17.4 liters of fuel compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2008's 13.5 liters. This larger fuel tank allows for longer rides without the need for frequent refueling.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 boasts a stable frame, relatively low overall weight, good chassis, and high-quality components. These features contribute to its excellent handling and make it a joy to ride. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 offers an extremely agile handling, low weight, adjustable chassis, and good brakes. These strengths make it a nimble and responsive bike, perfect for riders who prioritize maneuverability.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

However, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 does have some weaknesses. Its single-cylinder engine is significantly weaker compared to the Triumph's three-cylinder engine, resulting in less power and acceleration. Additionally, the KTM may offer somewhat less comfort compared to the Triumph.

On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 has a weakness in terms of its exhaust. Some riders have reported that the exhaust can be somewhat loud in the long run, which may be a concern for those who prefer a quieter ride.

In conclusion, while both the KTM 690 Duke 2008 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016 offer exciting riding experiences, they have distinct differences. The Triumph excels in terms of engine power, agility, and adjustability, while the KTM offers stability, a strong frame, and good handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Техничке спецификације KTM 690 Duke 2008 у поређењу са Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2008
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016
Покажи све
Само исто
Разликама
KTM 690 Duke 2008
KTM 690 Duke 2008
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

За и против у поређењу

За и против у поређењу

KTM 690 Duke 2008

KTM 690 Duke 2008

Finns det så många människor som inte behöver 100 hk för att stabilisera sitt ego? Jag tror att med tidigare encylindriga modeller var det alltid designen som var problemet, inte bristen på effekt. Duke lyckas se riktigt högkvalitativ ut även som en liten encylindrig.

Stabil ram

relativt låg totalvikt

bra chassi

högkvalitativa komponenter

starkt bromssystem

köregenskaper.

Betydligt svagare encylindrig motor, något sämre komfort, något sämre effekt.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016

Triumph Street Tripel R är känd som en extremt livlig nakencykel som är enormt rolig på landsvägen. Men den lilla R-Streety gör också en fin figur på racerbanan och går inte på nerverna med ett svampigt chassi eller för lite kraft. Även bromssystemet med sina två 310-millimetersskivor och radiellt monterade Nissin-fyrkolvsok fram är så kraftfullt som man kan förvänta sig av en mycket, mycket sportig motorcykel som också används till stor del på landsvägar eller i vardagen.

Livlig motor med tyrolskt ljud, extremt smidiga köregenskaper, låg vikt, distinkt utseende, justerbart chassi, bra bromsar.

något högljutt avgassystem på lång sikt

Поређење цена Просечна тржишна цена KTM 690 Duke vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2008 and a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2016. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 62 days compared to 85 days for a Triumph Street Triple 675 R. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R since model year 2009. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 13,000 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 675 R published on 7/20/2008.

Цена KTM 690 Duke

Модел година
Тренутне просечне тржишне цене

Цена Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Модел година
Тренутне просечне тржишне цене

Алтернативна поређења

1000ПС Партнер

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen