Husqvarna TE 125 2016 vs. Husqvarna TE 150 2024

The Husqvarna TE 125 2016 is the cheapest model in comparison to the Husqvarna TE 150 2024. It offers easy handling and provides the best learning effect for beginners. The bike has a single-cylinder engine with a bore of 54 mm and a stroke of 54.5 mm. The starter is kick-based, and the displacement is 124.8 ccm. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork from the brand WP, while the rear suspension is also from WP. The frame is made of steel and has a central tube design. The front tire diameter is 21 inches, and the rear tire width is 120 mm, with a diameter of 18 inches. The wheelbase measures 1471 mm, and the seat height is 960 mm. The dry weight of the bike is 96 kg, and it has a fuel tank capacity of 11 liters.

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

On the other hand, the Husqvarna TE 150 2024 has a more practical chassis setup that caters to a wide range of uses. It features precise lines and has a low vibration level in the saddle, providing a comfortable riding experience. The bike has a robust overall appearance and includes very practical details. It has a single-cylinder engine with a bore of 58 mm and a stroke of 54.5 mm. The starter is both electric and kick-based, offering convenience. The displacement is increased to 143.99 ccm, providing more power compared to the TE 125. The front and rear suspensions are the same as the TE 125, with upside-down telescopic forks from WP. However, the frame is made of chromium-molybdenum and has a double cradle, central tube design. The front tire diameter remains at 21 inches, but the rear tire width is increased to 140 mm. The wheelbase is slightly longer at 1487 mm, and the seat height is slightly lower at 952 mm. The dry weight of the bike is 100.2 kg, and it has a slightly smaller fuel tank capacity of 8.5 liters.

While the TE 125 has limited engine power and is less forgiving of mistakes, the TE 150 offers a more powerful engine and cleaner engine running. However, the TE 150 has some weaknesses, such as quickly worn plastics in the boot area and a higher price range. The recessed grip on the seat is also positioned too far forward, and the stand must be folded out in a somewhat fiddly manner. Additionally, the TE 150 may be more difficult for beginners to handle due to its aggressive response when transitioning from pushing to load operation and its challenging turning ability on uphill passages.

Husqvarna TE 150 2024

In summary, the Husqvarna TE 125 2016 is a budget-friendly option with easy handling and a great learning effect. On the other hand, the Husqvarna TE 150 2024 offers a more practical and versatile chassis setup, with a powerful engine and clean engine running. However, it has some drawbacks, including worn plastics, higher prices, and difficulties for beginners in handling.