Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber 2016 vs. Triumph Bonneville 2009

Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber 2016

Triumph Bonneville 2009
Преглед - Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber 2016 vs Triumph Bonneville 2009
The Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber 2016 and the Triumph Bonneville 2009 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and characteristics.
Starting with the technical specifications, the Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber 2016 is equipped with a V-type engine that delivers 55 horsepower and 62 Nm of torque. It has an oil-air cooling system and a displacement of 853cc. The rear suspension features a monoshock, while the front brakes have four pistons and are branded by Brembo. The front and rear tire diameters are both 16 inches, and the wheelbase measures 1480 mm. The seat height is 775 mm, and the fuel tank capacity is 15 liters.

Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber 2016
On the other hand, the Triumph Bonneville 2009 has an in-line crankpin offset engine that produces 67 horsepower and 69 Nm of torque. It is air-cooled and has a displacement of 865cc. The rear suspension is equipped with dual shocks, and the front brakes have double pistons branded by Nissin. The front and rear tire diameters are both 17 inches, and the wheelbase measures 1454 mm. The seat height is 751 mm, and the fuel tank capacity is 16 liters.
In terms of strengths, the Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber 2016 stands out for its cool look and authentic appearance. The engine is known for its cultivated performance, and the brakes are well controllable with inconspicuous ABS. On the other hand, the Triumph Bonneville 2009 offers stress-free handling and fine workmanship. The comfortable, full-length seat and sophisticated look are also notable features, along with the 7-spoke design.

Triumph Bonneville 2009
However, the Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber 2016 does have a weakness in that the engine could be a little stronger. On the other hand, the Triumph Bonneville 2009 is not built for acceleration duels, which may be a drawback for riders seeking a more aggressive riding experience.
In conclusion, both the Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber 2016 and the Triumph Bonneville 2009 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Moto Guzzi offers a cool and authentic look with a cultivated engine, while the Triumph Bonneville provides stress-free handling and fine workmanship. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Техничке спецификације Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber 2016 у поређењу са Triumph Bonneville 2009
За и против у поређењу
За и против у поређењу
Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber 2016

V9 Bobber är en helt autentisk modell - både som Moto Guzzi och som bobber. Den typiska längsgående V2-motorn med cylindrarna i vinkel uppåt visas stolt och dominerar de minimalistiska linjerna som ska känneteckna en bobber. Det lilla och breda framhjulet är särskilt lyckat, åtminstone visuellt. Med sina 55 hk sticker motorn inte ut alltför mycket från V7-serien, men tack vare den låga vikten på bara 200 kilo står ingenting i vägen för en fartfylld körning. Sittpositionen motsvarar också bobber-stilen - sportig och upprätt, du kan njuta av åkturen på den ädla och därför inte så dyra maskinen.
Triumph Bonneville 2009

The new Triumph Bonneville will please a lot of people, the potential customer base has definitely been expanded in all directions. Because it's not just the sportiness that has seen a significant increase.
Поређење цена Просечна тржишна цена Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber vs Triumph Bonneville
There are a few key differences between a Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber 2016 and a Triumph Bonneville 2009. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 9. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Bonneville with 50 days compared to 122 days for the Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber and 15 reviews for the Triumph Bonneville since model year 2006. The first review for the Moto Guzzi V9 Bobber was published on 3/17/2016 and now has more than 37,200 views. This compares to more than 4,700 views for the first review on Triumph Bonneville published on 9/22/2005.