KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Loading...

Pregled - KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs Yamaha MT-07 2016

The KTM 690 Duke 2013 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both popular naked bikes with their own unique features and strengths.

Starting with the KTM 690 Duke 2013, it boasts a lightweight design, weighing in at only 149.5 kg. This light weight contributes to its agility and maneuverability, making it a joy to ride in city traffic or on twisty roads. The bike is powered by a single-cylinder engine with 68 HP and 70 Nm of torque, providing sufficient power for most riding situations. Additionally, the liquid cooling system ensures optimal engine performance even in hot weather conditions. The 690ccm displacement further adds to its power and performance.

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

In terms of suspension, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 features an Upside-Down telescopic fork, which provides excellent handling and stability. The frame is made of chromium-molybdenum, ensuring durability and strength. The front and rear tyres have a width of 120 mm and 160 mm respectively, with a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase measures at 1466 mm, offering stability and control. The seat height is 835 mm, which may be a bit high for shorter riders. The fuel tank capacity is 14 liters, allowing for decent range between refueling stops.

Moving on to the Yamaha MT-07 2016, it has a slightly higher engine power of 75 HP, generated by a twin-cylinder engine. The torque is slightly lower at 68 Nm, but still provides ample power for most riding situations. Like the KTM, it features a liquid cooling system and a displacement of 689ccm.

The Yamaha MT-07 2016 is praised for its very agile engine and easy handling, making it a great choice for riders of all skill levels. The bike is also relatively lightweight, weighing in at 179 kg. Its aggressively angular look adds to its appeal, giving it a sporty and modern aesthetic. The powerful brakes ensure excellent stopping power, adding to the overall safety of the bike. The seating position is comfortable, allowing for long rides without discomfort. The display is extensive and easy to read, providing all the necessary information to the rider.

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

However, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 does have some weaknesses. The chassis is a little soft, which may affect the bike's stability at higher speeds or during aggressive cornering. The footrests may also drag on the ground, limiting the bike's lean angle. Additionally, some plastic parts on the bike may feel cheap and not as durable. The telescopic fork is considered by some to be boring and lacking in performance compared to other suspension systems.

In conclusion, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both solid choices in the naked bike category. The KTM offers a lightweight design, sufficient power, and low consumption. On the other hand, the Yamaha provides a very agile engine, easy handling, and a comfortable seating position. Both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference and riding style.

Tehnične specifikacije KTM 690 Duke 2013 v primerjavi z Yamaha MT-07 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2013
Yamaha MT-07 2016

Motor in pogonski sklop

IzvrtinaIzvrtina102 mmIzvrtina80 mm
GibGib84.5 mmGib68.6 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja68 KMMoč motorja75 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči7,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,000 min-1
NavorNavor70 NmNavor68 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru5,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru6,500 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje12.6 Kompresijsko razmerje11.5
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkePreprečevanje poskakovanja kolesaTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri2
GibiGibiŠtiritaktniGibiŠtiritaktni
VentiliVentiliNihajni vzvod, Odmična gred v glavi motorjaVentiliDvojna odmična gred v glavi motorja
HlajenjeHlajenjetekočinaHlajenjetekočina
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina690 cm3Gibna prostornina689 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeTeleskopske vilice

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirKrom-molibdenOkvirJeklo

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike160 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike180 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike60 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike55 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,466 mmMedosna razdalja1,400 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža835 mmVišina sedeža805 mm
Lastna masaLastna masa149.5 kgLastna masa179 kg
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo14 lProstornina posode za gorivo14 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemASkladnost z dovoljenjemA

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

For pure fun, the 690 Duke without the R is already sufficient. The potent single-cylinder engine is almost identical, as is the weight and handling, and the appearance is too similar to be a real selling point for the 690 Duke R.

Light weight

sufficient power

low consumption

No chassis adjustment possible

low comfort

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

The MT-07 is an incredible fun machine that is extremely sporty to ride. The brakes pack a punch, the handling is superb and the engine is currently by far the most agile powerplant in this class - and even above.

Very agile engine

very easy handling

low weight

aggressively angular look

powerful brakes

comfortable seating position

throaty sound

extensive and easy-to-read display

Chassis a little soft

Footrests soon drag

partly cheap plastic parts

boring telescopic fork

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen KTM 690 Duke vs Yamaha MT-07

There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2013 and a Yamaha MT-07 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-07 2016 is about 17% higher. A KTM 690 Duke 2013 experiences a loss of 200 USD in one year and 610 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 390 USD and 710 USD for a Yamaha MT-07 2016. Compared to Yamaha MT-07 2016 there are less KTM 690 Duke 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 9 compared to 24. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-07 with 51 days compared to 60 days for the KTM 690 Duke. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 since model year 2013. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 12,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-07 published on 11/4/2013.

Cena KTM 690 Duke

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena Yamaha MT-07

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG