Yamaha XSR900 2018 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Loading...

Pregled - Yamaha XSR900 2018 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

The Yamaha XSR900 2018 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, cooling systems, and frame types. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 has a slight advantage with 135 HP compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2018's 115 HP. The Triumph also has a higher torque of 111 Nm compared to the Yamaha's 87.5 Nm. This gives the Triumph a more powerful and responsive feel on the road.

Both bikes have three cylinders and liquid cooling, ensuring efficient heat dissipation and optimal engine performance. The Yamaha has a displacement of 847 ccm, while the Triumph has a larger displacement of 1050 ccm. This means the Triumph may have a slight edge in terms of overall power and acceleration.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, some riders have found the Showa suspension elements on the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 to be slightly uncomfortable, potentially affecting the overall riding experience. The Yamaha XSR900 2018 does not have any reported issues with its suspension.

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Both bikes have aluminum frames with twin tube designs, providing stability and durability. The Yamaha XSR900 2018 has a wheelbase of 1440 mm, slightly longer than the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013's 1435 mm. This may contribute to the Yamaha's more stable and planted feel on the road.

In terms of tire dimensions, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Triumph has a wider rear tire width of 190 mm compared to the Yamaha's 180 mm. This may provide the Triumph with better traction and stability during cornering.

The Yamaha XSR900 2018 has a lower seat height of 815 mm compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013's 825 mm. This may make the Yamaha more accessible to riders of shorter stature.

In terms of weight, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 is lighter with a kerb weight of 188 kg compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013's 214 kg. This lighter weight may contribute to the Yamaha's more agile and maneuverable feel on the road.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Both bikes have fuel tank capacities that differ, with the Triumph having a larger capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the Yamaha's 14 liters. This may give the Triumph a longer range between refueling stops.

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 is praised for its extremely sporty and rev-happy engine, excellent brakes, and pleasant seating position. It is also highly regarded for its high-quality workmanship and good price-performance ratio. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 is praised for its powerful three-cylinder engine, sporty driving feel, upright seating position, and stable frame.

As for weaknesses, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 is criticized for its almost too direct throttle response and retro style that may not be thought through to the last detail. The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 has been noted to have slightly uncomfortable Showa suspension elements and stubborn handling.

In conclusion, both the Yamaha XSR900 2018 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 have their strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha offers a sporty and rev-happy engine, excellent brakes, and a pleasant seating position, while the Triumph provides a powerful engine, sporty driving feel, and a stable frame. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Tehnične specifikacije Yamaha XSR900 2018 v primerjavi z Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Yamaha XSR900 2018
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Motor in pogonski sklop

Vrsta motorjaVrsta motorjaVrstniVrsta motorjaVrstni
IzvrtinaIzvrtina78 mmIzvrtina79 mm
GibGib59.1 mmGib71.4 mm
Moč motorjaMoč motorja115 KMMoč motorja135 KM
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji močiŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči10,000 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri največji moči9,400 min-1
NavorNavor87.5 NmNavor111 Nm
Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoruŠtevilo vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru8,500 min-1Število vrtljajev na minuto pri navoru7,750 min-1
Kompresijsko razmerjeKompresijsko razmerje11.5 Kompresijsko razmerje12
Tip sklopkeTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeliTip sklopkeVečdelna sklopka v oljni kopeli
Prenos močiPrenos močiVerigaPrenos močiVeriga
Število prestavŠtevilo prestav6Število prestav6
CilindriCilindri3Cilindri3
Ventili na valjVentili na valj4Ventili na valj4
VentiliVentiliDvojna odmična gred v glavi motorjaVentiliDvojna odmična gred v glavi motorja
HlajenjeHlajenjetekočinaHlajenjetekočina
Gibna prostorninaGibna prostornina847 cm3Gibna prostornina1,050 cm3

Sprednje vzmetenje

Sprednje vzmetenjeSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske viliceSprednje vzmetenjeObrnjene teleskopske vilice

Podvozje

OkvirOkvirAluminijOkvirAluminij
Tip okvirjaTip okvirjaDvojna cevTip okvirjaDvojna cev

Zadnje zavore

VrstaVrstaKolutVrstaKolut

Mere in mase

Širina sprednje pnevmatikeŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mmŠirina sprednje pnevmatike120 mm
Višina sprednje pnevmatikeVišina sprednje pnevmatike70 %Višina sprednje pnevmatike70 %
Premer sprednje pnevmatikePremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer sprednje pnevmatike17 palcev
Širina zadnje pnevmatikeŠirina zadnje pnevmatike180 mmŠirina zadnje pnevmatike190 mm
Višina zadnje pnevmatikeVišina zadnje pnevmatike55 %Višina zadnje pnevmatike55 %
Premer zadnje pnevmatikePremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcevPremer zadnje pnevmatike17 palcev
DolžinaDolžina2,075 mmDolžina2,100 mm
ŠirinaŠirina815 mmŠirina795 mm
VišinaVišina1,135 mmVišina1,110 mm
Medosna razdaljaMedosna razdalja1,440 mmMedosna razdalja1,435 mm
Višina sedežaVišina sedeža815 mmVišina sedeža825 mm
Lastna masaLastna masa188 kgLastna masa214 kg
Prostornina posode za gorivoProstornina posode za gorivo14 lProstornina posode za gorivo17.5 l
Skladnost z dovoljenjemSkladnost z dovoljenjemASkladnost z dovoljenjemA

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Primerjava prednosti in slabosti

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 je klasična optična iluzija - s svojim okroglim žarometom, oglatim rezervoarjem in pritrjeno zadnjo lučjo se očitno zdi, da gre za retro motorno kolo. Vendar ni naključje, da po zmogljivostih spominja na zmogljiv naked bike srednjega razreda Yamaha MT-09, ki je izjemno športna osnova za model XSR900. Motor je torej silovit, zavore pa primerno strupene. Na srečo inženirji niso pretiravali s podvozjem, XSR900 ponuja dovolj udobja, pokončen položaj za vožnjo pa je udobnejši, kot bi zaradi zmogljivega motorja pričakovali. Na splošno je XSR900 eden najbolj športnih modelov med retro motornimi kolesi.

Izjemno športen motor z veliko vrtljaji

odlične zavore

vožnja na ravni golega kolesa

prijeten položaj sedenja

kakovostna izdelava

razmerje med ceno in zmogljivostjo.

skoraj preveč neposreden odziv

retro slog ni premišljen do zadnje podrobnosti

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Več moči, več kilogramov, več gume . Zagotovo ni najbolj obvladljiv, zato je plezanje po tirolskih gorah skozi stotine ovinkov na trenutke naporno. Vendar je bolj zrel od modela Street Triple, po dolini zna drseti gladko in ne da bi vam šel na živce, iz nekega razloga pa se zdi bolj zanesljiv in varen.

Zmogljiv trivaljni motor

športni vozni občutek

pokončno sedenje

stabilen okvir.

Elementi vzmetenja Showa nekoliko neudobni

trmasto upravljanje.

Primerjava povprečnih tržnih cen Yamaha XSR900 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2018 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 is about 3% higher. Compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 there are less Yamaha XSR900 2018 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 66 days compared to 123 days for the Yamaha XSR900. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 11/25/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 16,200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 10/2/2007.

Cena Yamaha XSR900

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Cena Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Modelsko leto
Trenutne povprečne tržne cene

Druge primerjave

Partner platforme 1000PS

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG